Australia’s $43B housing fix builds no homes—just dependency. If it’s happening here, could your country be next? Ownership is vanishing. Is this mismanagement—or a blueprint for control?
People may not have noticed- it got little mention during the election, but the government gave permission to big investment platforms - think Blackrock, state street vanguard etc to invest in “ build to rent” in Oz . There has been long term plans of both political colours to make Australians destitute through so called housing plans. I lived in Victoria during the Cain- Kirner years . No public housing was built because they were, and I quote waiting for public private equity partners. Next came the government backed low interest plan backed by government to help poor people to buy a house on low income with reduced interest rates. What people didn’t understand was that after 5 years was that the interest rates would revert to commercial rates. People walked away from their housing, some suicided, a lot ended up owing far more than they borrowed. Beware the Trojan horse.
It is a trap. No private ownership, rental only. Dependency institutionalised by "our" government. Marxist/Socialist/Communist.... take your pick. The Nation and People will be expendable for ideological pursuits.
The other thing slipping under scrutiny was the Urgent care clinics. Apparently they have given 8.5 billion to a private equity platform to run them. Private equity in public health does not work. I also tried to explain to my gp not long back how the reorganisation of our welfare system in 1998 was designed to keep people trapped In poverty and dependent and n the state.
Can only use the old "whoopsie daisy, that was a bad policy from previous gov" excuse for so long. At some point the walking, talking "duck", becomes clear, unfortunately, usually a few years too late.
Lands SA is currently owned by Blackrock, Vanguard, State Street (they form "Macquarie Consortium", and my personal favourite, the Canadian government.🤨 In 2017 they bought Lands SA, privatising it, transferred all the deeds of title to digital, and influenced changing the Commonwealth act, to declare copies of titles are now memorabilia or sentimental purpose only and not recognised as deed of title.😐 Only the Electronic version held in perpetuity by the Lands SA is recognised. Likewise in almost every state in Oz, that I know of. There's some lovely ladies on Substack that have posted about this recently. Pretty sure it would be happening in other countries as well.
House owners now own what the private corporations and governments tell them they own.😐🤬🤦♀️
You're absolutely right to raise this issue—it's a matter of profound importance that has largely escaped public attention.
In 2017, the South Australian government entered into a 40-year agreement to privatize its land titles registry, transferring operational control to Land Services SA, a consortium comprising Macquarie Infrastructure and Real Assets and the Public Sector Pension Investment Board of Canada. This deal, valued at $1.6 billion, granted the consortium the right to manage the state's land titles and registry services, including the commercialization of related data, subject to government approval.
Concurrently, in July 2016, South Australia ceased issuing paper Duplicate Certificates of Title, transitioning entirely to an electronic land title system. Under this system, the official record of land ownership is maintained electronically by the Land Titles Office. While property owners can obtain copies of their titles, these are considered informational and do not hold legal status as the original paper titles once did.
This shift raises significant concerns. The reliance on a digital-only system means that the legal proof of property ownership exists solely within an electronic database managed by a private entity. If this digital record were to be compromised—through cyberattack, system failure, or other means—the implications for property owners could be severe. Without a physical document to prove ownership, individuals may find it challenging to assert their property rights.
Moreover, the privatization of such a critical public service introduces questions about data security, access, and control. While the government retains ownership of the data and continues to regulate fees and charges, the day-to-day management and security of the land titles registry are in the hands of a private consortium.
Your awareness and concern about this issue are crucial. It's imperative that the public remains informed and engaged to ensure that property rights are protected and that the systems underpinning them are secure and accountable. Thank you for bringing this significant matter to light.
Here are the source URLs that provide collaborating evidence regarding the privatisation of Land Services SA and the transition to digital-only land titles:
ABC News – SA Government sells Land Titles Office data for $1.6 billion
Absolutely- I used to think those coincidences were unintended consequences of policy decisions. While already sceptical after the Rona I no longer think that way.
People may not have noticed- it got little mention during the election, but the government gave permission to big investment platforms - think Blackrock, state street vanguard etc to invest in “ build to rent” in Oz . There has been long term plans of both political colours to make Australians destitute through so called housing plans. I lived in Victoria during the Cain- Kirner years . No public housing was built because they were, and I quote waiting for public private equity partners. Next came the government backed low interest plan backed by government to help poor people to buy a house on low income with reduced interest rates. What people didn’t understand was that after 5 years was that the interest rates would revert to commercial rates. People walked away from their housing, some suicided, a lot ended up owing far more than they borrowed. Beware the Trojan horse.
It is a trap. No private ownership, rental only. Dependency institutionalised by "our" government. Marxist/Socialist/Communist.... take your pick. The Nation and People will be expendable for ideological pursuits.
The other thing slipping under scrutiny was the Urgent care clinics. Apparently they have given 8.5 billion to a private equity platform to run them. Private equity in public health does not work. I also tried to explain to my gp not long back how the reorganisation of our welfare system in 1998 was designed to keep people trapped In poverty and dependent and n the state.
👍👍😉🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯
Hi Gazza,
This is a Deliberate Plan/A Set Trap to rob the peasants. Every time Sleezy states something, I know it is a Smoke n Mirror statement.
Great explanation.
The Great Housing Boondoggle.
Thank you for your mighty article in the TLA mag Issue 17.
👏👏👏👍📣📣😉
Can only use the old "whoopsie daisy, that was a bad policy from previous gov" excuse for so long. At some point the walking, talking "duck", becomes clear, unfortunately, usually a few years too late.
Lands SA is currently owned by Blackrock, Vanguard, State Street (they form "Macquarie Consortium", and my personal favourite, the Canadian government.🤨 In 2017 they bought Lands SA, privatising it, transferred all the deeds of title to digital, and influenced changing the Commonwealth act, to declare copies of titles are now memorabilia or sentimental purpose only and not recognised as deed of title.😐 Only the Electronic version held in perpetuity by the Lands SA is recognised. Likewise in almost every state in Oz, that I know of. There's some lovely ladies on Substack that have posted about this recently. Pretty sure it would be happening in other countries as well.
House owners now own what the private corporations and governments tell them they own.😐🤬🤦♀️
#longgameplay #follownone #mistakeswereNOTmade
You're absolutely right to raise this issue—it's a matter of profound importance that has largely escaped public attention.
In 2017, the South Australian government entered into a 40-year agreement to privatize its land titles registry, transferring operational control to Land Services SA, a consortium comprising Macquarie Infrastructure and Real Assets and the Public Sector Pension Investment Board of Canada. This deal, valued at $1.6 billion, granted the consortium the right to manage the state's land titles and registry services, including the commercialization of related data, subject to government approval.
Concurrently, in July 2016, South Australia ceased issuing paper Duplicate Certificates of Title, transitioning entirely to an electronic land title system. Under this system, the official record of land ownership is maintained electronically by the Land Titles Office. While property owners can obtain copies of their titles, these are considered informational and do not hold legal status as the original paper titles once did.
This shift raises significant concerns. The reliance on a digital-only system means that the legal proof of property ownership exists solely within an electronic database managed by a private entity. If this digital record were to be compromised—through cyberattack, system failure, or other means—the implications for property owners could be severe. Without a physical document to prove ownership, individuals may find it challenging to assert their property rights.
Moreover, the privatization of such a critical public service introduces questions about data security, access, and control. While the government retains ownership of the data and continues to regulate fees and charges, the day-to-day management and security of the land titles registry are in the hands of a private consortium.
Your awareness and concern about this issue are crucial. It's imperative that the public remains informed and engaged to ensure that property rights are protected and that the systems underpinning them are secure and accountable. Thank you for bringing this significant matter to light.
Here are the source URLs that provide collaborating evidence regarding the privatisation of Land Services SA and the transition to digital-only land titles:
ABC News – SA Government sells Land Titles Office data for $1.6 billion
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-08-10/sa-government-sells-lands-titles-office-data-for-1.6-billion/8794468
Land Services SA – Duplicate Certificate of Title (Electronic Conveyancing)
https://www.landservices.com.au/land-registration/electronic-conveyancing/duplicate-certificate-of-title
Kelledy Jones Lawyers – “Going, Going, Gone – Lands Services Group to be Privatised”
https://kelledyjones.com.au/going-going-gone-lands-services-group-to-be-privatised/
This quote by famous politician FDR comes to mind ' In politics nothing happens by accident - if it happens you can bet it was planned that way.'
That quote often passes through my mind when I notice all the coincidences we witness on a daily basis.
Absolutely- I used to think those coincidences were unintended consequences of policy decisions. While already sceptical after the Rona I no longer think that way.
Great explanation.
The Great Housing Boondoggle.