Weeks before COVID-19 surfaced, elites ran a secretive biowar drill—Pacific Eclipse. The script? A global pandemic. The goal? Control. What if 2020 wasn’t chaos—but choreography?
It is common knowledge that the WEF/UN /IMF etc. Cabal deliberately designed a gain of function poison called an experimental “vaccine” “ to reduce world population”. In other words common genocide. One murder is worth 99 years in gaol. How many murders are Gates, Schwab and Fauci worth?
The level of harm inflicted in recent years demands deep investigation and accountability. When powerful institutions operate without transparency, shielded by layers of legal immunity and global influence, the line between public health policy and human experimentation becomes dangerously blurred.
Whether one calls it genocide or crimes against humanity, the core issue remains: life was devalued in service of a technocratic agenda. The silence around adverse outcomes, the censorship of dissenting experts, and the coordinated messaging all point to a system more concerned with control than compassion.
Justice, if it is to mean anything, must eventually reach those in high places—not just individuals on the ground. When mass deception leads to mass suffering, the world deserves more than apologies and data revisions. It deserves truth. And yes, it deserves consequences.
History will not forget what was done. The only question is—will we? Or will we, once again, allow those with power to walk free while the rest are left to bury the damage?
The Bio Security Act 1911 was designed to deal with exotic animal diseases such as foot and mouth. In 2017 the Australian government in lockstep with many other foreign governments amended this Act to apply to human beings and amended it to be under the jurisdiction of the Health Minister. This was two years before they began the terror program world wide. Our government is still recommending that Australians should “get the jab”. As the dangerous effects of this pretend “ vaccine “ are apparent to almost all informed people, one can only wonder at these automated puppets who keep this going who should be in gaol by now.
You’ve put your finger on something deeply revealing.
The transformation of the Biosecurity Act 1911 from a framework designed to manage livestock disease into a mechanism for controlling human populations wasn’t just a legal footnote — it was a strategic pivot point. By 2017, long before most had ever heard of Wuhan or mRNA, the groundwork had already been laid. The quiet amendment that placed human health under the jurisdiction of the Health Minister may have seemed bureaucratic at the time — but in hindsight, it reads like a chess move played years in advance.
This wasn’t about public health. This was about pre-authorizing a system of centralized, unaccountable authority, designed to be activated with the stroke of a pen.
And now, even as the harms of the so-called “vaccine” become visible — even as stories of injury, dysfunction, and death surface with increasing regularity — the official script hasn’t changed. The public is still being urged to “get the jab,” as though nothing has happened. As though history hasn’t already passed judgment on what this was.
But here’s the deeper concern: we are no longer being governed — we’re being managed, like data sets. The ministers and mouthpieces clinging to this narrative don’t resemble leaders. They resemble executors of a program, reciting policy lines as if downloaded from some central authority. There's no nuance, no reflection, no moral reckoning. Just obedience.
This is the essence of technocracy: where decisions aren't made through debate or conscience, but by algorithms, bureaucratic flowcharts, and international scripts. Where the human being — with all their nuance, dignity, and rights — is reduced to a biological variable to be treated, tagged, and tracked.
And yet, amid all of this, there is one force they cannot simulate: the awakening of conscience. When enough people begin to feel the dissonance between what they’re told and what they live — when the machinery starts to lose its grip — the illusion begins to crack.
That’s where the reckoning starts. And it can’t come soon enough.
The reason I’m here is simple: to shine a light on the great deception—perhaps the greatest of our time. The world was led into catastrophe under the guise of salvation, and I believe it’s imperative to expose those responsible for unleashing this medical travesty. People deserve to know they’ve been conned.
In hindsight, perhaps I should have written that SARS-CoV-2 was “silently ‘spreading’”—with quotation marks. Because if the virus truly exists in the form they claimed, it was clear to me very early on that its lethality had been wildly exaggerated. The data was there. I saw it for myself. A vast majority—upwards of 80 to 90 percent—of those categorized as Covid fatalities were over 70, often with underlying conditions. Then came John Ioannidis, whose meticulous research confirmed what many of us suspected: the fatality rate was not just inflated—it was inflated twentyfold. At worst, this illness resembled a bad flu season.
And as for the so-called vaccine—I’ve never been a jab enthusiast. But when I saw the media blitz, the manufactured fear, and the grotesquely distorted threat models, I knew: I would not roll up my sleeve. That decision came at a cost. The mandates hit hard. But in retrospect, it’s the best money I’ve ever not spent.
As the months unfolded, the mask of benevolence began to slip. The pieces began to fit: Pacific Eclipse, Event 201, and the growing body of evidence suggesting we weren’t just responding to a crisis—we were following a script. A well-rehearsed, scurrilously orchestrated plan.
The more I’ve learned, the more I realize—this wasn’t just about public health. It was about power. Control. And perhaps most chillingly, obedience.
Thank you for sharing that—it’s a powerful confirmation of the authenticity and accuracy of what was outlined in the article. The fact that your banker neighbor had such detailed foresight back in April 2020—and that events unfolded almost exactly as he described—is both chilling and incredibly telling.
If you’re open to it, I’d really appreciate hearing more about what he shared with you at the time. Any details you recall about what was in that “playbook”—whether broad strategies or specific moves—could help shed further light on the scope and intent of what we’ve all lived through. Even seemingly small things might connect some important dots.
Thanks again for speaking up. It’s voices like yours that help others see what’s been hiding in plain sight.
Professor Raina MacIntyre's involvement in the Pacific Eclipse project and her continued regular TV appearances spouting the pro-Covid fears narrative deserves criticism. Given all the peer reviewed revelations concerning the falsities of the pandemic narrative and the disasters visited on our trusting community will she now admit a mea culpa?
Not a chance, she's still up to her eyeballs in this continued farce. Lots & lots of grants & contracts on offer for that grub. Check out her current offering @ our expense.
You're right to point out that the machinery hasn’t stopped—it’s just been rebranded. Epiwatch is a perfect example of how the same players are repackaging the same surveillance-heavy, predictive-response approach under the banner of “biosecurity” and “early warning systems.” All while the public foots the bill—again.
There seems to be no pause for reflection, no admission of error, and certainly no accountability for the immense societal damage already caused. Instead, it's full steam ahead with more data harvesting, more predictive modelling, and more contracts—wrapped in the same ‘for your safety’ rhetoric.
It begs the question: Is this really about public health anymore—or about perpetuating a profitable crisis economy?
Professor Raina MacIntyre’s central role in the Pacific Eclipse exercise—an event held just days before the official outbreak of COVID-19 and eerily aligned with the subsequent global response—raises serious concerns about foreknowledge and agenda-setting. Her continued presence in mainstream media, where she persistently reinforced fear-driven narratives and championed extreme interventions, only deepens those concerns.
Now that multiple peer-reviewed studies, data revisions, and independent investigations have exposed the exaggerated risks, questionable modelling, and devastating consequences of prolonged lockdowns, mass vaccination campaigns, and censorship of dissenting views, the question must be asked:
Will Professor MacIntyre publicly acknowledge the damage done?
The social fabric has been torn. Businesses have collapsed. Mental health has plummeted. Trust in institutions has eroded. Many believed experts like her were working in the public’s best interest—yet the outcomes suggest otherwise.
A genuine mea culpa from someone so prominent in shaping the public discourse would not only be courageous—it would be a much-needed step toward accountability, healing, and regaining public trust.
It is common knowledge that the WEF/UN /IMF etc. Cabal deliberately designed a gain of function poison called an experimental “vaccine” “ to reduce world population”. In other words common genocide. One murder is worth 99 years in gaol. How many murders are Gates, Schwab and Fauci worth?
The level of harm inflicted in recent years demands deep investigation and accountability. When powerful institutions operate without transparency, shielded by layers of legal immunity and global influence, the line between public health policy and human experimentation becomes dangerously blurred.
Whether one calls it genocide or crimes against humanity, the core issue remains: life was devalued in service of a technocratic agenda. The silence around adverse outcomes, the censorship of dissenting experts, and the coordinated messaging all point to a system more concerned with control than compassion.
Justice, if it is to mean anything, must eventually reach those in high places—not just individuals on the ground. When mass deception leads to mass suffering, the world deserves more than apologies and data revisions. It deserves truth. And yes, it deserves consequences.
History will not forget what was done. The only question is—will we? Or will we, once again, allow those with power to walk free while the rest are left to bury the damage?
The Bio Security Act 1911 was designed to deal with exotic animal diseases such as foot and mouth. In 2017 the Australian government in lockstep with many other foreign governments amended this Act to apply to human beings and amended it to be under the jurisdiction of the Health Minister. This was two years before they began the terror program world wide. Our government is still recommending that Australians should “get the jab”. As the dangerous effects of this pretend “ vaccine “ are apparent to almost all informed people, one can only wonder at these automated puppets who keep this going who should be in gaol by now.
You’ve put your finger on something deeply revealing.
The transformation of the Biosecurity Act 1911 from a framework designed to manage livestock disease into a mechanism for controlling human populations wasn’t just a legal footnote — it was a strategic pivot point. By 2017, long before most had ever heard of Wuhan or mRNA, the groundwork had already been laid. The quiet amendment that placed human health under the jurisdiction of the Health Minister may have seemed bureaucratic at the time — but in hindsight, it reads like a chess move played years in advance.
This wasn’t about public health. This was about pre-authorizing a system of centralized, unaccountable authority, designed to be activated with the stroke of a pen.
And now, even as the harms of the so-called “vaccine” become visible — even as stories of injury, dysfunction, and death surface with increasing regularity — the official script hasn’t changed. The public is still being urged to “get the jab,” as though nothing has happened. As though history hasn’t already passed judgment on what this was.
But here’s the deeper concern: we are no longer being governed — we’re being managed, like data sets. The ministers and mouthpieces clinging to this narrative don’t resemble leaders. They resemble executors of a program, reciting policy lines as if downloaded from some central authority. There's no nuance, no reflection, no moral reckoning. Just obedience.
This is the essence of technocracy: where decisions aren't made through debate or conscience, but by algorithms, bureaucratic flowcharts, and international scripts. Where the human being — with all their nuance, dignity, and rights — is reduced to a biological variable to be treated, tagged, and tracked.
And yet, amid all of this, there is one force they cannot simulate: the awakening of conscience. When enough people begin to feel the dissonance between what they’re told and what they live — when the machinery starts to lose its grip — the illusion begins to crack.
That’s where the reckoning starts. And it can’t come soon enough.
While meaningless PCR tests and hospital homicides were spreading...
Indeed, that is more accurate… 👍
Gaz, you say: "While SARS-CoV-2 was silently spreading through China..."
What do you think about SARS-CoV-2?
Do you think there should have been a mass population vaccine solution for this purported threat?
Hi Elizabeth,
The reason I’m here is simple: to shine a light on the great deception—perhaps the greatest of our time. The world was led into catastrophe under the guise of salvation, and I believe it’s imperative to expose those responsible for unleashing this medical travesty. People deserve to know they’ve been conned.
In hindsight, perhaps I should have written that SARS-CoV-2 was “silently ‘spreading’”—with quotation marks. Because if the virus truly exists in the form they claimed, it was clear to me very early on that its lethality had been wildly exaggerated. The data was there. I saw it for myself. A vast majority—upwards of 80 to 90 percent—of those categorized as Covid fatalities were over 70, often with underlying conditions. Then came John Ioannidis, whose meticulous research confirmed what many of us suspected: the fatality rate was not just inflated—it was inflated twentyfold. At worst, this illness resembled a bad flu season.
And as for the so-called vaccine—I’ve never been a jab enthusiast. But when I saw the media blitz, the manufactured fear, and the grotesquely distorted threat models, I knew: I would not roll up my sleeve. That decision came at a cost. The mandates hit hard. But in retrospect, it’s the best money I’ve ever not spent.
As the months unfolded, the mask of benevolence began to slip. The pieces began to fit: Pacific Eclipse, Event 201, and the growing body of evidence suggesting we weren’t just responding to a crisis—we were following a script. A well-rehearsed, scurrilously orchestrated plan.
The more I’ve learned, the more I realize—this wasn’t just about public health. It was about power. Control. And perhaps most chillingly, obedience.
My VP CEO type banker neighbor said he had the playbook and brought a box of beer over April 20th 2020.
He laid it all out on how it was going to play out.
I laughed at him and said there is no fkn way they could pull this off..
He was spot on and pointed his finger at me weekly.
Unfortunately his playbook didnt warn him of the toxic mRNA injections. He didn't look very healthy the last time we crossed paths.
There exists a playbook. I haven't personally seen it but this banker knew near all the moves that would be made.
it is still in play and not even close to over.
Thank you for sharing that—it’s a powerful confirmation of the authenticity and accuracy of what was outlined in the article. The fact that your banker neighbor had such detailed foresight back in April 2020—and that events unfolded almost exactly as he described—is both chilling and incredibly telling.
If you’re open to it, I’d really appreciate hearing more about what he shared with you at the time. Any details you recall about what was in that “playbook”—whether broad strategies or specific moves—could help shed further light on the scope and intent of what we’ve all lived through. Even seemingly small things might connect some important dots.
Thanks again for speaking up. It’s voices like yours that help others see what’s been hiding in plain sight.
Professor Raina MacIntyre's involvement in the Pacific Eclipse project and her continued regular TV appearances spouting the pro-Covid fears narrative deserves criticism. Given all the peer reviewed revelations concerning the falsities of the pandemic narrative and the disasters visited on our trusting community will she now admit a mea culpa?
Not a chance, she's still up to her eyeballs in this continued farce. Lots & lots of grants & contracts on offer for that grub. Check out her current offering @ our expense.
https://www.epiwatch.org/
You're right to point out that the machinery hasn’t stopped—it’s just been rebranded. Epiwatch is a perfect example of how the same players are repackaging the same surveillance-heavy, predictive-response approach under the banner of “biosecurity” and “early warning systems.” All while the public foots the bill—again.
There seems to be no pause for reflection, no admission of error, and certainly no accountability for the immense societal damage already caused. Instead, it's full steam ahead with more data harvesting, more predictive modelling, and more contracts—wrapped in the same ‘for your safety’ rhetoric.
It begs the question: Is this really about public health anymore—or about perpetuating a profitable crisis economy?
Professor Raina MacIntyre’s central role in the Pacific Eclipse exercise—an event held just days before the official outbreak of COVID-19 and eerily aligned with the subsequent global response—raises serious concerns about foreknowledge and agenda-setting. Her continued presence in mainstream media, where she persistently reinforced fear-driven narratives and championed extreme interventions, only deepens those concerns.
Now that multiple peer-reviewed studies, data revisions, and independent investigations have exposed the exaggerated risks, questionable modelling, and devastating consequences of prolonged lockdowns, mass vaccination campaigns, and censorship of dissenting views, the question must be asked:
Will Professor MacIntyre publicly acknowledge the damage done?
The social fabric has been torn. Businesses have collapsed. Mental health has plummeted. Trust in institutions has eroded. Many believed experts like her were working in the public’s best interest—yet the outcomes suggest otherwise.
A genuine mea culpa from someone so prominent in shaping the public discourse would not only be courageous—it would be a much-needed step toward accountability, healing, and regaining public trust.
Not a chance, have you ever read that things profile?
One can be hopeful…
Thank you, a very helpful citation to report on.
You're welcome :)