I love what you have written here Gaz, thank you! Could not have said it better. People are too trusting and dont ask the right questions. The sort of questions you have asked in this article. Brings to mind what a Nazi said at his trial, a bit like these words, Ordinary people only tell little lies, they dont really comprehend that some people tell really big lies, because they would not do that themselves. The biggest lie is that the major Capitalists want huge wealth to be happy themselves, yet are so hypocritical as to tell us we will be happy with nothing!!!!! They are also the biggest rapists of Earth, sucking out minerals, coal seam gas etc and not repairing the land and water afterwards.
I also liked your very measured tone. Something I am still working on😄
Thank you so much for your generous words—I truly appreciate your thoughtful engagement. You’ve raised a powerful point about the scale of deception we sometimes struggle to comprehend. That quote you referenced—about ordinary people telling small lies and being unable to fathom big ones—resonates deeply with the core concern behind this article. Many well-meaning people simply can’t imagine the level of manipulation that can occur when enormous wealth, global influence, and ideology converge behind closed doors.
And you’re absolutely right to call out the hypocrisy: those who amass unfathomable wealth through extractive industries and unchecked expansion now lecture the rest of us about sustainability and austerity. The disconnect between their actions and their messaging is glaring. It’s not about shared sacrifice—it’s about control, and ensuring their dominance under a new guise.
What gives me hope is that more people like yourself are asking questions and recognising the pattern. Once we start seeing through the polite lies and glossy promises, we’re far harder to manipulate. And I must say—your voice is measured, honest, and strong. Keep speaking, keep questioning, and keep challenging the script. That’s how truth regains its footing.
Thanks for sending this through. I’ve read some of Dick Yardley’s material in the past and I can see how much research and passion has gone into it. He certainly raises provocative issues that challenge the mainstream narrative and encourage people to look more closely at the legal and constitutional frameworks that govern us. While I’m not committed to every conclusion drawn, I do think it’s valuable to keep questioning the shifts that have taken place over time—especially where sovereignty, ownership, and governance are concerned. These are conversations worth having, and I appreciate that you’re thinking deeply about them too.
You scribbed " . . . do think it’s valuable to keep questioning the shifts that have taken place over time—especially where sovereignty, ownership, and governance are concerned."
I note the song by Queen "Open Your Eyes and See . . . ". Gough Whitlam put All of Australian Fed & State plus State Branches/Depts under the Yank Stock Exchange as Corporations.
ALL Fed/State Corporation/Branches have their own Australian ABN Numbers pre GST Requirements that came into play in 2000.
Hhmm, so what Unelected International Group are the Treasonist Individuals Operating as "Australian" Politicians on behalf [cough cough] of Australians?
Appreciate your thoughtful response. I agree—it is important to dig into these claims, especially those that deal with corporate structures, international influence, and how our sovereignty might be quietly compromised. I’ve seen references to the ABN system and the corporatisation of government departments before, and while I’m careful not to leap to conclusions, I absolutely believe these topics warrant deeper public scrutiny.
As for who might be behind such underhanded shifts? That’s the million-dollar question. It’s rarely just one group—but rather an entangled web of international interests, economic alliances, supranational organisations, and unaccountable bureaucratic actors. The problem is: they operate through layers of plausible deniability, technocratic language, and administrative reshuffling that makes them very difficult to pin down.
That said, the most consistent thread through history seems to trace back to those with banking and global financial interests—those who benefit from debt dependency, asset stripping, and the erosion of national sovereignty. Follow the money, and the picture becomes clearer.
The more we ask questions like yours, the harder it becomes for those hiding behind complexity to stay in the shadows. Keep pushing—open eyes are the first step to open conversations.
What JacqNSW has informed you about Gaz, are not 'claims', they are indisputable, evidential facts
Indeed, all roads lead back to the bankers and war mongers; There's very good reason why they have been booted from over 109 sovereign lands over 1030 times since the fall of Babylon which, I will add, they also caused the collapse of
Somehow they managed to find a permanent home in the Americas, so much so that they now control the joint; Again, this is not any sort of 'claim', it is indisputable, evidential Fact
US.inc is 'mystery babylon' and it may be of no surprise to your-self, but 'Australia' has been under US.inc administration since 1910, closely followed by the 'greater' administration of the 'League of Nations' in 1919 that evolved into what we know as the U.N today in 1932... and the Aussie Poly Ticks are all well-aware of this which puts them all in Treason.
I honestly think 'people' are not asking any questions at all, let alone asking "the right questions"
It ought to be clearly obvious that something is terribly wrong with 'life', particularly at the present time, but still most 'people' continue trudging along blissfully unaware of the how's and why's (machinations) of how their daily lives have turned into a struggle not too dissimilar from 'the great depression' or actual 'war time' periods of history not-long-past
They still obey 'big bro's' every command and demand; they still offer their servitude to the breads and circus's provided for their 'relief' of the weeks end... only to do the exact same trudging along after the weekend, only with a lot-less shekels in their pockets until master gives them some more shekels for their weekly indentured, 40 plus hours of servitude at which time, they voluntarily hand master the majority of their 'pay' just so they can survive while master gorges his fat, filthy, treasonous face on the spoils forced from the mouths of the great unwashed peasants
why do I put inverted commas above the word 'people' you might ask? well, people have forgotten what it means to be people as they hand their lives over to 'big bro' without a thought in the world
"ah, what can I do? "this is just the way life is"
You’ve captured the quiet tragedy of our times with piercing clarity. When people stop asking questions, they stop being truly people—they become manageable units in someone else's system. But your awareness, and the fact that you’re still asking, proves that not all have surrendered. The first step to reclaiming life is to remember it wasn’t always like this—and doesn’t have to stay this way.
Thank you—your words resonate deeply. Remembering that it wasn’t always like this is powerful. And yes, as long as some of us keep asking questions, the system hasn’t won. Let’s keep that light alive.
You're welcome Gaz... Not only do I ask pertinent questions, I shout those questions from the roof tops, every chance I get
When I find irrefutable, evidential answers, I then shout those answers from the roof tops
I know I have 'annoyed' some people on substack with my 'rants' but it seems if I don't run the ball of treason up the field, no-one else on this platform will
They way I see it, if we, as a community of people, don't start seriously investigating Lawful means and then put those Lawful means into action to put an end to the current, tyrannical fascist dictatorship that is controlling every aspect of our daily lives, then some time in the not-too-distant future, all hell is going to break loose
Aussies are by nature, a peaceful, fun loving lot until we are not; When the penny finally drops what the Poly Ticks did during 'covid' and what they have all been doing since not long after federation, then Aussies are going to be vying for blood... That's just the way we are
Any wonder then that the Poly Ticks are replacing us with 3rd world others as fast as they possibly can?
Treason, Treason followed by more Treason, every which way we look.
Appreciate your fierce passion and your rooftop honesty—it’s clear you’re driven by a desire to awaken others, and that matters. While “treason” carries weight, I lean toward terms like “systemic betrayal” or “dereliction of duty”—they strike just as hard but can’t be as easily dismissed. Either way, I hear you! Let’s keep asking, exposing, and encouraging others to truly see.
Gaz, there is absolutely no sunset clause for the crime of Treason unlike the other crime of 'dereliction of duty' which only pertains to active Military duty
'systematic betrayal' is a nothing crime... even if it were a crime, it would take decades of testimony that would not exclude somehow questioning the dead
Each to their own and all that jazz, but I choose to call what the Poly Tick parasites have done and continue to do for exactly what it is; Treason against the people and Treason against The Commonwealth of Australia
I didn't know that SA has ditched it's very own Torrens Title system to go digital. Does anyone remember the 1970's Partnership Pacific scandal? It seems to be memory holed from the internet but it involved dodgy to non existent titles. In my 'yoof' I spent many hours in title offices.
I've been re-reading Kage Baker's "the Company/Dr. Zeus, Inc." series of historical time travel science fiction and have been struck by the snippets of the future world of 2400 she portrays which very much mirrors "You will own nothing and be happy".
Thank you so much—really appreciate your thoughtful words. That’s a fascinating connection with The Company series too. It’s amazing how fiction often foreshadows reality. And yes, the Torrens shift is a quiet but profound change. It was a tip from a reader, and I followed it up. (barefoot healer) Let’s keep these memories—and questions—alive.
seems like the communist ideal, you'll own nothing and be happy. Yet no one ever mentions that. People always bring up the one and only evil ever in the history of the world, nazis.
You’ve voiced what many are quietly thinking. I too once leaned toward the idea that this was neo-Marxism rebranded—but the more I dug, the more it began to look like that was just the mask. Behind it? A colder, data-driven ideology: technocracy. It’s not about collective liberation, but about control through systems—algorithmic governance, digital ID, programmable currency.
Don’t take my word for it—have a look through the technocracy-tagged posts on this Substack since January 2025. The pattern becomes clearer with every step. Ultimately, it’s up to each of us to make up our own minds—but we have to start by looking.
Best summary overview seen yet. Allows zeroing in, with logical precision. Congrats. Properly terrifying. Call to action....circulate and discuss everywhere, especially on campuses and every parliamentary population at every level.
Thank you sincerely—that means a great deal. Also most people aren’t foolish, just kept in the dark. It’s time to switch the light on. Let’s get this shared far and wide—across campuses, councils, conversations, and kitchen tables. The more we speak up, the harder it becomes for them to keep the truth buried. Let’s inform, connect, and awaken.
Great essay! And Smart Cities have been on the agenda since at least 1995, which I have proof of, so it would be interesting to know exactly how far back this goes. I’m guessing the 1960s.
Thank you! You’re right to seek precision. We do know that the term “Smart Cities” gained policy traction in the mid-1990s, but how far back the underlying ideas go—that’s a worthwhile area for careful investigation. I’d guess it would be the 1930s, when technocracy was first dreamed up. If you’re able to share your documentation, it could really help map the timeline more accurately.
Thanks Gaz, there’s pics of a brochure from WA State Planning that I found, on my Stack, it was my most recent Post, made 1/5/2025. I can send more pics if you need.
Life by subscription. Peeping-Tom tech companies. Happy is whatever they define as makes you happy - like the conditioning now to own a house, an investment property, a Porsche, Friday night football - all you need for happiness and freedom (sic)! Tomorrow it will be the Soma. ".....give unto Caeser what is Caeser's' I guess is the ultimate choice.
Brilliantly said—comfort sold as freedom, surveillance sold as safety, and happiness redefined as compliance. But not everyone’s buying it. Some of us still remember what real freedom feels like.
Does anyone know about Healthscope- private equity platform total failure in public health. Not mentioned during the last election Albanese gave 8.5 billion to a private equity platform firm to run all his urgent care clinics.or how about politicians and the judiciary not mandated for death vax because of “constitutional “ issues. Would that be the same constitution supposed to protect us? Or have they. Created their own elitist constitution?
Sharp questions, Julie—and important ones. When billions go to private equity like Healthscope with no real scrutiny, and elites dodge mandates citing “constitutional” grounds, you have to ask: whose Constitution is it really? Feels like one rule for them, another for us. Keep asking. Keep sharing.
An excellent essay the main thrust if which i believe in and align myself to. One point (maybe fundamental) i think you are wrong on is state ownership of infrastructure. The way to almost guarantee freedoms is to minimise the role of Govts in everything and get rid of it completely wherever practicable.
Thanks for the feedback, JB—and I really appreciate that you found resonance in the central message of the piece.
You raise an important and often debated point: the role of government versus private enterprise in owning and operating infrastructure. I completely understand the instinct to limit government involvement—especially when we’ve seen how bloated, inefficient, or self-serving public institutions can become. But I’d gently suggest that the answer may not be as simple as “less government equals more freedom.”
The problem isn’t ownership per se, but intent and accountability. When infrastructure is publicly owned for the public good, with transparent governance and clear citizen oversight, it can act as a bulwark against technocratic or corporate overreach. Roads, water, energy grids—these are essential lifelines. If they’re handed entirely to private or corporate hands, particularly those with globalist or technocratic leanings, we risk creating monopolies of access where freedom becomes conditional, subscription-based, or programmable.
The current threat isn’t from your local town council owning a dam—it’s from multinational entities like BlackRock or Palantir creating the infrastructure of control under the banner of efficiency, innovation, or ESG compliance.
So I agree with you in spirit: minimise coercion, maximise liberty. But I’d argue we should be wary of any form of concentrated power—public or private. The goal, perhaps, is not simply “less government,” but “more accountable, decentralised, citizen-focused governance,” coupled with robust protections from unaccountable corporate dominance.
Appreciate you being part of the conversation, mate. These are the kind of exchanges we need to sharpen the path forward.
Different factions but in the same part Gaz. I'm 100% in line with your overall views but I've never found any example of Govts adding net value to Society at large (sometimes they have good intentions but mostly it's about power or naivety. As for the big Corps... they have become dangerous IMO simply because we operate crony capitalism where they lobby politicians for 'favours' so the market ends up being 'rigged'. Get rid of most Govt and allow companies to stand on their own (some transition plan of course) I think that will deliver much more freedom and prosperity for us.
Thanks again, JB. I really respect where you're coming from, and you’ve articulated it well. Truth is, regardless of which system we lean toward—less government or more accountable public stewardship—neither can function as intended under the weight of systemic corruption and the influence of technocrats and transnational corporate power.
We’re in a moment now where the real battle isn't just about structure, but about integrity, accountability, and transparency—things that have been hollowed out by both political and corporate elites. Until those fundamental breaches of trust are dealt with, all models risk being hijacked.
So I think we’re very much in the same camp, trying to reclaim a future where people, not profiteers or power-brokers, shape the world we live in. Appreciate you staying in the conversation—these exchanges matter.
Excellent summary Gaz. I think it may have been you who recommended books by Patrick M Wood, three of which I have just read, which has made me understand the scale of the planned tyranny and how well advanced those plans are. I shall send this to my family and friends as so many people are just milling around on the railway track and just can't, or won't, see the locomotive hurtling towards them.
Absolutely—and you’ve nailed a crucial point. True human rights are inherent and non-negotiable, yet during the mandates, many were pressured to conform to a narrative rather than be protected by principle. It’s up to those who do see the difference to keep the conversation alive and help others rediscover what real rights look like
I wrote a book called “Pandoras Box” about the pandemic, I was amazed how people believed converting our cells into viral antigens conferred immunity and not disease!
That’s an incredibly important effort—well done for having the determination and clarity to write Pandora’s Box. You’re right: the level of blind belief in the “new science” was staggering, especially when it flipped foundational immunology on its head.
Yes. I’ve spoke to a lot of doctors and health practitioners for the book and nobody could answer the simple question; how does turning our cells into viral antigens confer immunity and not disease. I have yet to get an answer?
That’s such an important and fair question—and you’re absolutely right to keep asking it. I’m not a medical expert, but if those within the medical system can’t provide a clear, consistent answer to such a basic concern, it speaks volumes. Is your book published?
Brilliantly written Gaz... I'm forwarding on to a few people... I've got nothing to add to that article it's perfect.
I've mentioned before the work of Josephine Cashman, regarding the use of "Native Title" to wipe away land ownership in Australia, then the US, Canada and New Zealand, with ownership of native title to be administered by the UN. Then in true elite style, they have a scapegoat, population will complain about Aboriginal land grab, when in fact it's a UN land grab, Aboriginals will be in the same boat as all of us as no-one can own native title land... It's an evil genius scheme.
Next check out the maps... In case you hadn't seen this
(These smaller "first nations" will be used to further confine you, along with the 15 minute smart city, you will be in a small native country, no more big USA or Australia to freely travel, you stay in your UN designated small tribal nation. You'll need permission to leave your small first nation piece of Australia)...
But as is, your article is excellent... Adding native title might muddy the water... In Europe, I hear (without sources) they'll use "re-wilding" as a scheme to push farmers and country folk out and into 15 minute cities...
Thanks for the thoughtful and in-depth response—it’s clear you’ve put serious time into studying this topic and engaging with some of the more controversial theories circulating around Native Title, UNDRIP, and global governance.
You’re right to highlight Josephine Cashman’s work, which certainly taps into growing public unease about the erosion of sovereignty and the role supranational institutions might be playing—whether intentionally or not—in reshaping how we understand land ownership, governance, and rights in our respective countries. Her argument that these initiatives may serve as a form of “soft recolonisation” under the banner of reconciliation or environmental protection is a provocative one—and it’s resonating with many people for a reason.
At the same time, I agree it’s important we tread carefully. While there’s no doubt that UN-driven policies and the rise of technocratic globalism deserve scrutiny, it’s equally crucial not to flatten the complexity of Indigenous rights movements or overlook the legitimate grievances these communities have carried for generations. As you noted, the danger lies in conflating separate but adjacent issues—like environmentalism, land reform, and centralised global governance—without hard evidence of a unified agenda behind them.
I also appreciate your point about adding the Native Title aspect possibly muddying the waters of the article—it’s a delicate topic, and one that can easily be misunderstood or misrepresented if not handled with precision. But your insight into how this could tie into broader strategies like 15-minute cities and “re-wilding” projects is valuable, and definitely something to keep watching.
Thanks again for your deep engagement—raising these issues helps fuel the kind of informed, grounded conversation we need more of right now. Let’s keep questioning, but also stay sharp on where the lines between fact, concern, and speculation lie.
Yes ... I agree, it's hard, with knowledge of the tragic and horrific history of Aboriginal displacement, to suggest that this is now perhaps being used as weaponised compassion to not help Aboriginal people, but make them the scapegoats for others to establish a NWO.
"The idea of global governance is openly discussed in Victorian England, from its conception the United Nations was always a British idea.⁴
Ironically, the underlying scheme appears to be re-colonisation for total control—an effort to establish a feudal Empire 2.0.⁵
Royal agent Nugget Coombs dedicated his life to this insidious agenda. He left London to implement in the Reserve (Central) Bank of Australia, after which he went on to become the first head of Aboriginal Affairs in Canberra. Where he introduced native communal title and Aboriginal self-determination—a right that, under international law, can include succession, leading to the break up of Australia into First Nations.⁶"
"Why would a London banker take such a keen interest in Aboriginal affairs—someone whose priorities lie in the wealth of nations, control of resources, financial dominance, and global markets? What influence does this hold, and more critically, what agenda is being orchestrated in secret? This is not mere curiosity or benevolence; it is a calculated move—one designed to reshape land ownership, dictate policy, and consolidate power under foreign interests. This interference could fundamentally alter Australia’s sovereignty, entangling the nation in a web of economic subjugation and legislative control."
At the London School of Economics, Coombs studied under one of the most influential Marxist thinkers of the 20th century."
"Then it clicked—Coombs was not just a London banker but a key operative within a secret international cartel, an orchestrated network seeking to dismantle sovereign nations to seize their resources and wealth."
☝️Her latest article has some sharp observations (I do not know enough about any of the people in Aboriginal people mentioned at the start to validate her observations, but the later part of the article is what I've quoted 👇
I love what you have written here Gaz, thank you! Could not have said it better. People are too trusting and dont ask the right questions. The sort of questions you have asked in this article. Brings to mind what a Nazi said at his trial, a bit like these words, Ordinary people only tell little lies, they dont really comprehend that some people tell really big lies, because they would not do that themselves. The biggest lie is that the major Capitalists want huge wealth to be happy themselves, yet are so hypocritical as to tell us we will be happy with nothing!!!!! They are also the biggest rapists of Earth, sucking out minerals, coal seam gas etc and not repairing the land and water afterwards.
I also liked your very measured tone. Something I am still working on😄
Thank you so much for your generous words—I truly appreciate your thoughtful engagement. You’ve raised a powerful point about the scale of deception we sometimes struggle to comprehend. That quote you referenced—about ordinary people telling small lies and being unable to fathom big ones—resonates deeply with the core concern behind this article. Many well-meaning people simply can’t imagine the level of manipulation that can occur when enormous wealth, global influence, and ideology converge behind closed doors.
And you’re absolutely right to call out the hypocrisy: those who amass unfathomable wealth through extractive industries and unchecked expansion now lecture the rest of us about sustainability and austerity. The disconnect between their actions and their messaging is glaring. It’s not about shared sacrifice—it’s about control, and ensuring their dominance under a new guise.
What gives me hope is that more people like yourself are asking questions and recognising the pattern. Once we start seeing through the polite lies and glossy promises, we’re far harder to manipulate. And I must say—your voice is measured, honest, and strong. Keep speaking, keep questioning, and keep challenging the script. That’s how truth regains its footing.
You may want to have a read of this Gaz, if you haven't already done so
What happened to Our Commonwealth: https://sbnqv6tu5xb0.cdn.shift8web.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Timeline-of-Treason-v3.pdf
Thanks for sending this through. I’ve read some of Dick Yardley’s material in the past and I can see how much research and passion has gone into it. He certainly raises provocative issues that challenge the mainstream narrative and encourage people to look more closely at the legal and constitutional frameworks that govern us. While I’m not committed to every conclusion drawn, I do think it’s valuable to keep questioning the shifts that have taken place over time—especially where sovereignty, ownership, and governance are concerned. These are conversations worth having, and I appreciate that you’re thinking deeply about them too.
Dear Gazza,
You scribbed " . . . do think it’s valuable to keep questioning the shifts that have taken place over time—especially where sovereignty, ownership, and governance are concerned."
I note the song by Queen "Open Your Eyes and See . . . ". Gough Whitlam put All of Australian Fed & State plus State Branches/Depts under the Yank Stock Exchange as Corporations.
ALL Fed/State Corporation/Branches have their own Australian ABN Numbers pre GST Requirements that came into play in 2000.
Hhmm, so what Unelected International Group are the Treasonist Individuals Operating as "Australian" Politicians on behalf [cough cough] of Australians?
I look forward to your response.
Kind Regards
Appreciate your thoughtful response. I agree—it is important to dig into these claims, especially those that deal with corporate structures, international influence, and how our sovereignty might be quietly compromised. I’ve seen references to the ABN system and the corporatisation of government departments before, and while I’m careful not to leap to conclusions, I absolutely believe these topics warrant deeper public scrutiny.
As for who might be behind such underhanded shifts? That’s the million-dollar question. It’s rarely just one group—but rather an entangled web of international interests, economic alliances, supranational organisations, and unaccountable bureaucratic actors. The problem is: they operate through layers of plausible deniability, technocratic language, and administrative reshuffling that makes them very difficult to pin down.
That said, the most consistent thread through history seems to trace back to those with banking and global financial interests—those who benefit from debt dependency, asset stripping, and the erosion of national sovereignty. Follow the money, and the picture becomes clearer.
The more we ask questions like yours, the harder it becomes for those hiding behind complexity to stay in the shadows. Keep pushing—open eyes are the first step to open conversations.
What JacqNSW has informed you about Gaz, are not 'claims', they are indisputable, evidential facts
Indeed, all roads lead back to the bankers and war mongers; There's very good reason why they have been booted from over 109 sovereign lands over 1030 times since the fall of Babylon which, I will add, they also caused the collapse of
Somehow they managed to find a permanent home in the Americas, so much so that they now control the joint; Again, this is not any sort of 'claim', it is indisputable, evidential Fact
US.inc is 'mystery babylon' and it may be of no surprise to your-self, but 'Australia' has been under US.inc administration since 1910, closely followed by the 'greater' administration of the 'League of Nations' in 1919 that evolved into what we know as the U.N today in 1932... and the Aussie Poly Ticks are all well-aware of this which puts them all in Treason.
I honestly think 'people' are not asking any questions at all, let alone asking "the right questions"
It ought to be clearly obvious that something is terribly wrong with 'life', particularly at the present time, but still most 'people' continue trudging along blissfully unaware of the how's and why's (machinations) of how their daily lives have turned into a struggle not too dissimilar from 'the great depression' or actual 'war time' periods of history not-long-past
They still obey 'big bro's' every command and demand; they still offer their servitude to the breads and circus's provided for their 'relief' of the weeks end... only to do the exact same trudging along after the weekend, only with a lot-less shekels in their pockets until master gives them some more shekels for their weekly indentured, 40 plus hours of servitude at which time, they voluntarily hand master the majority of their 'pay' just so they can survive while master gorges his fat, filthy, treasonous face on the spoils forced from the mouths of the great unwashed peasants
why do I put inverted commas above the word 'people' you might ask? well, people have forgotten what it means to be people as they hand their lives over to 'big bro' without a thought in the world
"ah, what can I do? "this is just the way life is"
You’ve captured the quiet tragedy of our times with piercing clarity. When people stop asking questions, they stop being truly people—they become manageable units in someone else's system. But your awareness, and the fact that you’re still asking, proves that not all have surrendered. The first step to reclaiming life is to remember it wasn’t always like this—and doesn’t have to stay this way.
Thank you—your words resonate deeply. Remembering that it wasn’t always like this is powerful. And yes, as long as some of us keep asking questions, the system hasn’t won. Let’s keep that light alive.
You're welcome Gaz... Not only do I ask pertinent questions, I shout those questions from the roof tops, every chance I get
When I find irrefutable, evidential answers, I then shout those answers from the roof tops
I know I have 'annoyed' some people on substack with my 'rants' but it seems if I don't run the ball of treason up the field, no-one else on this platform will
They way I see it, if we, as a community of people, don't start seriously investigating Lawful means and then put those Lawful means into action to put an end to the current, tyrannical fascist dictatorship that is controlling every aspect of our daily lives, then some time in the not-too-distant future, all hell is going to break loose
Aussies are by nature, a peaceful, fun loving lot until we are not; When the penny finally drops what the Poly Ticks did during 'covid' and what they have all been doing since not long after federation, then Aussies are going to be vying for blood... That's just the way we are
Any wonder then that the Poly Ticks are replacing us with 3rd world others as fast as they possibly can?
Treason, Treason followed by more Treason, every which way we look.
Appreciate your fierce passion and your rooftop honesty—it’s clear you’re driven by a desire to awaken others, and that matters. While “treason” carries weight, I lean toward terms like “systemic betrayal” or “dereliction of duty”—they strike just as hard but can’t be as easily dismissed. Either way, I hear you! Let’s keep asking, exposing, and encouraging others to truly see.
Gaz, there is absolutely no sunset clause for the crime of Treason unlike the other crime of 'dereliction of duty' which only pertains to active Military duty
'systematic betrayal' is a nothing crime... even if it were a crime, it would take decades of testimony that would not exclude somehow questioning the dead
Each to their own and all that jazz, but I choose to call what the Poly Tick parasites have done and continue to do for exactly what it is; Treason against the people and Treason against The Commonwealth of Australia
These crimes are relatively easy to prove.
"Be happy" really means BE HUNGRY
Ain’t that the truth!
Zer vill be enough bugz bars for ze obedient, don't you worry.
Great summary Gaz.
I didn't know that SA has ditched it's very own Torrens Title system to go digital. Does anyone remember the 1970's Partnership Pacific scandal? It seems to be memory holed from the internet but it involved dodgy to non existent titles. In my 'yoof' I spent many hours in title offices.
I've been re-reading Kage Baker's "the Company/Dr. Zeus, Inc." series of historical time travel science fiction and have been struck by the snippets of the future world of 2400 she portrays which very much mirrors "You will own nothing and be happy".
Great work you are doing Gaz.
Thank you.
Thank you so much—really appreciate your thoughtful words. That’s a fascinating connection with The Company series too. It’s amazing how fiction often foreshadows reality. And yes, the Torrens shift is a quiet but profound change. It was a tip from a reader, and I followed it up. (barefoot healer) Let’s keep these memories—and questions—alive.
seems like the communist ideal, you'll own nothing and be happy. Yet no one ever mentions that. People always bring up the one and only evil ever in the history of the world, nazis.
You’ve voiced what many are quietly thinking. I too once leaned toward the idea that this was neo-Marxism rebranded—but the more I dug, the more it began to look like that was just the mask. Behind it? A colder, data-driven ideology: technocracy. It’s not about collective liberation, but about control through systems—algorithmic governance, digital ID, programmable currency.
Don’t take my word for it—have a look through the technocracy-tagged posts on this Substack since January 2025. The pattern becomes clearer with every step. Ultimately, it’s up to each of us to make up our own minds—but we have to start by looking.
Best summary overview seen yet. Allows zeroing in, with logical precision. Congrats. Properly terrifying. Call to action....circulate and discuss everywhere, especially on campuses and every parliamentary population at every level.
Thank you sincerely—that means a great deal. Also most people aren’t foolish, just kept in the dark. It’s time to switch the light on. Let’s get this shared far and wide—across campuses, councils, conversations, and kitchen tables. The more we speak up, the harder it becomes for them to keep the truth buried. Let’s inform, connect, and awaken.
Great essay! And Smart Cities have been on the agenda since at least 1995, which I have proof of, so it would be interesting to know exactly how far back this goes. I’m guessing the 1960s.
Thank you! You’re right to seek precision. We do know that the term “Smart Cities” gained policy traction in the mid-1990s, but how far back the underlying ideas go—that’s a worthwhile area for careful investigation. I’d guess it would be the 1930s, when technocracy was first dreamed up. If you’re able to share your documentation, it could really help map the timeline more accurately.
Thanks Gaz, there’s pics of a brochure from WA State Planning that I found, on my Stack, it was my most recent Post, made 1/5/2025. I can send more pics if you need.
Life by subscription. Peeping-Tom tech companies. Happy is whatever they define as makes you happy - like the conditioning now to own a house, an investment property, a Porsche, Friday night football - all you need for happiness and freedom (sic)! Tomorrow it will be the Soma. ".....give unto Caeser what is Caeser's' I guess is the ultimate choice.
Brilliantly said—comfort sold as freedom, surveillance sold as safety, and happiness redefined as compliance. But not everyone’s buying it. Some of us still remember what real freedom feels like.
Does anyone know about Healthscope- private equity platform total failure in public health. Not mentioned during the last election Albanese gave 8.5 billion to a private equity platform firm to run all his urgent care clinics.or how about politicians and the judiciary not mandated for death vax because of “constitutional “ issues. Would that be the same constitution supposed to protect us? Or have they. Created their own elitist constitution?
Sharp questions, Julie—and important ones. When billions go to private equity like Healthscope with no real scrutiny, and elites dodge mandates citing “constitutional” grounds, you have to ask: whose Constitution is it really? Feels like one rule for them, another for us. Keep asking. Keep sharing.
An excellent essay the main thrust if which i believe in and align myself to. One point (maybe fundamental) i think you are wrong on is state ownership of infrastructure. The way to almost guarantee freedoms is to minimise the role of Govts in everything and get rid of it completely wherever practicable.
Thanks for the feedback, JB—and I really appreciate that you found resonance in the central message of the piece.
You raise an important and often debated point: the role of government versus private enterprise in owning and operating infrastructure. I completely understand the instinct to limit government involvement—especially when we’ve seen how bloated, inefficient, or self-serving public institutions can become. But I’d gently suggest that the answer may not be as simple as “less government equals more freedom.”
The problem isn’t ownership per se, but intent and accountability. When infrastructure is publicly owned for the public good, with transparent governance and clear citizen oversight, it can act as a bulwark against technocratic or corporate overreach. Roads, water, energy grids—these are essential lifelines. If they’re handed entirely to private or corporate hands, particularly those with globalist or technocratic leanings, we risk creating monopolies of access where freedom becomes conditional, subscription-based, or programmable.
The current threat isn’t from your local town council owning a dam—it’s from multinational entities like BlackRock or Palantir creating the infrastructure of control under the banner of efficiency, innovation, or ESG compliance.
So I agree with you in spirit: minimise coercion, maximise liberty. But I’d argue we should be wary of any form of concentrated power—public or private. The goal, perhaps, is not simply “less government,” but “more accountable, decentralised, citizen-focused governance,” coupled with robust protections from unaccountable corporate dominance.
Appreciate you being part of the conversation, mate. These are the kind of exchanges we need to sharpen the path forward.
Different factions but in the same part Gaz. I'm 100% in line with your overall views but I've never found any example of Govts adding net value to Society at large (sometimes they have good intentions but mostly it's about power or naivety. As for the big Corps... they have become dangerous IMO simply because we operate crony capitalism where they lobby politicians for 'favours' so the market ends up being 'rigged'. Get rid of most Govt and allow companies to stand on their own (some transition plan of course) I think that will deliver much more freedom and prosperity for us.
Thanks again, JB. I really respect where you're coming from, and you’ve articulated it well. Truth is, regardless of which system we lean toward—less government or more accountable public stewardship—neither can function as intended under the weight of systemic corruption and the influence of technocrats and transnational corporate power.
We’re in a moment now where the real battle isn't just about structure, but about integrity, accountability, and transparency—things that have been hollowed out by both political and corporate elites. Until those fundamental breaches of trust are dealt with, all models risk being hijacked.
So I think we’re very much in the same camp, trying to reclaim a future where people, not profiteers or power-brokers, shape the world we live in. Appreciate you staying in the conversation—these exchanges matter.
#party
Excellent summary Gaz. I think it may have been you who recommended books by Patrick M Wood, three of which I have just read, which has made me understand the scale of the planned tyranny and how well advanced those plans are. I shall send this to my family and friends as so many people are just milling around on the railway track and just can't, or won't, see the locomotive hurtling towards them.
Alas not many people know the difference between human rights and fitting into a narrative, as we saw with vaccine mandates.
Absolutely—and you’ve nailed a crucial point. True human rights are inherent and non-negotiable, yet during the mandates, many were pressured to conform to a narrative rather than be protected by principle. It’s up to those who do see the difference to keep the conversation alive and help others rediscover what real rights look like
I wrote a book called “Pandoras Box” about the pandemic, I was amazed how people believed converting our cells into viral antigens conferred immunity and not disease!
That’s an incredibly important effort—well done for having the determination and clarity to write Pandora’s Box. You’re right: the level of blind belief in the “new science” was staggering, especially when it flipped foundational immunology on its head.
Yes. I’ve spoke to a lot of doctors and health practitioners for the book and nobody could answer the simple question; how does turning our cells into viral antigens confer immunity and not disease. I have yet to get an answer?
That’s such an important and fair question—and you’re absolutely right to keep asking it. I’m not a medical expert, but if those within the medical system can’t provide a clear, consistent answer to such a basic concern, it speaks volumes. Is your book published?
Yes. On Amazon,
Brilliantly written Gaz... I'm forwarding on to a few people... I've got nothing to add to that article it's perfect.
I've mentioned before the work of Josephine Cashman, regarding the use of "Native Title" to wipe away land ownership in Australia, then the US, Canada and New Zealand, with ownership of native title to be administered by the UN. Then in true elite style, they have a scapegoat, population will complain about Aboriginal land grab, when in fact it's a UN land grab, Aboriginals will be in the same boat as all of us as no-one can own native title land... It's an evil genius scheme.
Next check out the maps... In case you hadn't seen this
https://open.substack.com/pub/josephinecashman/p/the-empire-20-un-veiling-the-global?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=tymb5
https://josephinecashman.substack.com/p/the-empire-20-un-veiling-the-global-0dd
https://josephinecashman.substack.com/p/the-uni-party-backs-un-drip
(These smaller "first nations" will be used to further confine you, along with the 15 minute smart city, you will be in a small native country, no more big USA or Australia to freely travel, you stay in your UN designated small tribal nation. You'll need permission to leave your small first nation piece of Australia)...
But as is, your article is excellent... Adding native title might muddy the water... In Europe, I hear (without sources) they'll use "re-wilding" as a scheme to push farmers and country folk out and into 15 minute cities...
Thanks for the thoughtful and in-depth response—it’s clear you’ve put serious time into studying this topic and engaging with some of the more controversial theories circulating around Native Title, UNDRIP, and global governance.
You’re right to highlight Josephine Cashman’s work, which certainly taps into growing public unease about the erosion of sovereignty and the role supranational institutions might be playing—whether intentionally or not—in reshaping how we understand land ownership, governance, and rights in our respective countries. Her argument that these initiatives may serve as a form of “soft recolonisation” under the banner of reconciliation or environmental protection is a provocative one—and it’s resonating with many people for a reason.
At the same time, I agree it’s important we tread carefully. While there’s no doubt that UN-driven policies and the rise of technocratic globalism deserve scrutiny, it’s equally crucial not to flatten the complexity of Indigenous rights movements or overlook the legitimate grievances these communities have carried for generations. As you noted, the danger lies in conflating separate but adjacent issues—like environmentalism, land reform, and centralised global governance—without hard evidence of a unified agenda behind them.
I also appreciate your point about adding the Native Title aspect possibly muddying the waters of the article—it’s a delicate topic, and one that can easily be misunderstood or misrepresented if not handled with precision. But your insight into how this could tie into broader strategies like 15-minute cities and “re-wilding” projects is valuable, and definitely something to keep watching.
Thanks again for your deep engagement—raising these issues helps fuel the kind of informed, grounded conversation we need more of right now. Let’s keep questioning, but also stay sharp on where the lines between fact, concern, and speculation lie.
Yes ... I agree, it's hard, with knowledge of the tragic and horrific history of Aboriginal displacement, to suggest that this is now perhaps being used as weaponised compassion to not help Aboriginal people, but make them the scapegoats for others to establish a NWO.
"The idea of global governance is openly discussed in Victorian England, from its conception the United Nations was always a British idea.⁴
Ironically, the underlying scheme appears to be re-colonisation for total control—an effort to establish a feudal Empire 2.0.⁵
Royal agent Nugget Coombs dedicated his life to this insidious agenda. He left London to implement in the Reserve (Central) Bank of Australia, after which he went on to become the first head of Aboriginal Affairs in Canberra. Where he introduced native communal title and Aboriginal self-determination—a right that, under international law, can include succession, leading to the break up of Australia into First Nations.⁶"
"Why would a London banker take such a keen interest in Aboriginal affairs—someone whose priorities lie in the wealth of nations, control of resources, financial dominance, and global markets? What influence does this hold, and more critically, what agenda is being orchestrated in secret? This is not mere curiosity or benevolence; it is a calculated move—one designed to reshape land ownership, dictate policy, and consolidate power under foreign interests. This interference could fundamentally alter Australia’s sovereignty, entangling the nation in a web of economic subjugation and legislative control."
At the London School of Economics, Coombs studied under one of the most influential Marxist thinkers of the 20th century."
"Then it clicked—Coombs was not just a London banker but a key operative within a secret international cartel, an orchestrated network seeking to dismantle sovereign nations to seize their resources and wealth."
☝️Her latest article has some sharp observations (I do not know enough about any of the people in Aboriginal people mentioned at the start to validate her observations, but the later part of the article is what I've quoted 👇
https://open.substack.com/pub/josephinecashman/p/a-web-of-lies-captured-nations?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=tymb5