Jane's faith in a life-saving treatment shatters as its deadly nature is revealed. Struggling with denial, she confronts the harsh reality, embodying the psychological struggle of willful blindness.
Yup, it is very very difficult to face. And very isolating. And then there's the fact that you have this sh*t in your body and therefore face inevitable consequences.
Denial seems far preferable to facing the big mistake! Depending on how personally strong and honest one is. And we have a good idea of where those attributes originate...
Rather let them read the science fiction and decide.
The following statements, which were made in 1981 by powerful international banker and unapologetic eugenicist, Jacques Attali, are taken from Interviews with Michel Salomon – The Faces of the Future, Seghers edition, which was published in France by Emi Lit when Attali was a senior adviser to French President, Francoise Mitterand:
“In the future it will be a question of finding a way to reduce the population. We will start with the old, because as soon as it exceeds 60-65 years man lives longer than he produces and costs society dearly, then the weak and then the useless who do nothing for society because there will be more and more of them, and especially the stupid ones.
Euthanasia targeting these groups; euthanasia will have to be an essential instrument of our future societies, in all cases. We cannot of course execute people or set up camps. We will get rid of them by making them believe it is for their own good.
•
International Banker, Eugenicist & Senior
Too large a population, and for the most part unnecessary, is something economically too expensive. Socially, it is also much better for the human machine to come to an abrupt halt rather than gradually deteriorating. We won’t be able to run intelligence tests on millions and millions of people, you can imagine!
We will find something or cause it, a pandemic that targets certain people, a real economic crisis or not, a virus that will affect the old or the fat, it doesn’t matter, the weak will succumb to it, the fearful and the stupid will believe it and ask to be treated.
We will have taken care to have planned the treatment, a treatment that will be the solution.
The selection of idiots will thus be done on its own: they will go to the slaughterhouse on their own.”
It’s important to clarify that the quotes you provided, attributed to Jacques Attali, have been widely circulated but remain controversial regarding their authenticity. I recently reviewed The Faces of the Future by Michel Salomon and found that these specific quotes do not appear in the text. However, I do subscribe to the idea that Attali might have been subtly hinting at future strategies by stealth. Rather than openly advocating for drastic population control measures, he seemed to suggest that pandemics, economic crises, or selective medical interventions could serve as indirect means to achieve such ends.
His language, though speculative, seemed more nuanced—leaving the impression that these weren’t just idle predictions. Attali appeared to weave in subtle suggestions that such mechanisms could become tools for shaping society under the pretense of managing economic or social stability. While he didn’t overtly promote these ideas, his tone and choice of words made me question whether there was an underlying agenda, hinting at future policies that could be framed as necessary responses to global challenges.
The context and phrasing suggest that while not directly advocating for population control, Attali was aware of, or perhaps even acknowledging, scenarios where the vulnerable and expendable could be ‘managed’ in ways that wouldn't provoke obvious backlash. This naturally raises the question of whether we are witnessing the early foundations of policies that, under the guise of crisis management, might ultimately fulfill some of these speculative strategies.
I don't know why you're speculating - it is obvious they want most of us gone. I mean look in the sky, the chemtrails, the fluoride in the water, the adulteration of foods and clothing we put near our bodies. How can anyone not be utterly convinced that we are under unequivocally under siege.
Did 'Jane' survive the Death Shot? Is 'Jane' still with us? How did 'Jane' avoid the mountain of damning evidence regarding Vax injuries, Vax related Deaths, along with the many medical reference to the ineffectiveness and dangers caused by the poisonous Experimental injections?
A very good analogy of how humans process and justify their reasoning to support and congratulate themselves on reaching the correct decisions. Even if those decisions were misguided and made before proper long-term information became available (or was deliberately hidden from view).
Unjabbed Mick (UK) We'll live longer without corrupted medical intervention.
Information is critical to have however people really need to put two and two together. Our lives are made into a hell simply by policies that are made up. It must be that most people think life is just natural to be this bad.
yes I like to think that many people are not aware of what has happened and therefore I tend to try to inform but yes can understand the concern as to the now known (well some of us) repercussions.
Doing this of course has me in hot water with family etc.
My daughter’s boyfriend’s parents just took him to get the Covid booster. 🤦♀️🤦♀️ I hope he lives. Hes 16 yrs old. He’s a super young man. I almost cried when she told me this. But they’re Uber-liberal and after the past 3 1/2 years of bullshit still have a “Vote Biden-Harris” sign in their window. I have no words
That's where the culpability comes in - if you pushing it onto your child without even knowing what's in the vaccine. Actually the vaccine debacle is shwoing us humans just what a dumb and sadistic bunch we are on the whole.
That is an unbelievable story about the 16 year old. In my view, people who vote like they’re supporting a football team, are brainless! I’m a swinging voter. Keep the bastards on their toes!
Medicine is a collection of dogmas, and the dogmas themselves are said to be only reproducible 50-70% of the time. There is no law like mechanics' F=md(v)/dt, and to understand and develop it requires a steady accumulation of science and mathematics at the high school and university level.
However, in medicine, as long as you can determine whether there is a contradiction, even a layman can tackle it from any angle. Don't trust what other people say, trust your own logical thinking.
Jane may have relied a little too much on what other people said.
Yup, it is very very difficult to face. And very isolating. And then there's the fact that you have this sh*t in your body and therefore face inevitable consequences.
Denial seems far preferable to facing the big mistake! Depending on how personally strong and honest one is. And we have a good idea of where those attributes originate...
The river in Egypt?
Indeed so. It is why people drown in 'de Nile', they deny what is in front of their eyes.
Rather let them read the science fiction and decide.
The following statements, which were made in 1981 by powerful international banker and unapologetic eugenicist, Jacques Attali, are taken from Interviews with Michel Salomon – The Faces of the Future, Seghers edition, which was published in France by Emi Lit when Attali was a senior adviser to French President, Francoise Mitterand:
“In the future it will be a question of finding a way to reduce the population. We will start with the old, because as soon as it exceeds 60-65 years man lives longer than he produces and costs society dearly, then the weak and then the useless who do nothing for society because there will be more and more of them, and especially the stupid ones.
Euthanasia targeting these groups; euthanasia will have to be an essential instrument of our future societies, in all cases. We cannot of course execute people or set up camps. We will get rid of them by making them believe it is for their own good.
•
International Banker, Eugenicist & Senior
Too large a population, and for the most part unnecessary, is something economically too expensive. Socially, it is also much better for the human machine to come to an abrupt halt rather than gradually deteriorating. We won’t be able to run intelligence tests on millions and millions of people, you can imagine!
We will find something or cause it, a pandemic that targets certain people, a real economic crisis or not, a virus that will affect the old or the fat, it doesn’t matter, the weak will succumb to it, the fearful and the stupid will believe it and ask to be treated.
We will have taken care to have planned the treatment, a treatment that will be the solution.
The selection of idiots will thus be done on its own: they will go to the slaughterhouse on their own.”
It’s important to clarify that the quotes you provided, attributed to Jacques Attali, have been widely circulated but remain controversial regarding their authenticity. I recently reviewed The Faces of the Future by Michel Salomon and found that these specific quotes do not appear in the text. However, I do subscribe to the idea that Attali might have been subtly hinting at future strategies by stealth. Rather than openly advocating for drastic population control measures, he seemed to suggest that pandemics, economic crises, or selective medical interventions could serve as indirect means to achieve such ends.
His language, though speculative, seemed more nuanced—leaving the impression that these weren’t just idle predictions. Attali appeared to weave in subtle suggestions that such mechanisms could become tools for shaping society under the pretense of managing economic or social stability. While he didn’t overtly promote these ideas, his tone and choice of words made me question whether there was an underlying agenda, hinting at future policies that could be framed as necessary responses to global challenges.
The context and phrasing suggest that while not directly advocating for population control, Attali was aware of, or perhaps even acknowledging, scenarios where the vulnerable and expendable could be ‘managed’ in ways that wouldn't provoke obvious backlash. This naturally raises the question of whether we are witnessing the early foundations of policies that, under the guise of crisis management, might ultimately fulfill some of these speculative strategies.
I don't know why you're speculating - it is obvious they want most of us gone. I mean look in the sky, the chemtrails, the fluoride in the water, the adulteration of foods and clothing we put near our bodies. How can anyone not be utterly convinced that we are under unequivocally under siege.
The man from Harvard Henry Kissinger, was one who called Attali brilliant. Kissinger, the author of the modern day USA eugenics policy called NSSM200.
Once I get some time in the next few days I put up my insights about Attali's comments in a couple of books he features in. Cheers
Well said. There will always be those who take others words and twist them to suit their own ends.
Did 'Jane' survive the Death Shot? Is 'Jane' still with us? How did 'Jane' avoid the mountain of damning evidence regarding Vax injuries, Vax related Deaths, along with the many medical reference to the ineffectiveness and dangers caused by the poisonous Experimental injections?
A very good analogy of how humans process and justify their reasoning to support and congratulate themselves on reaching the correct decisions. Even if those decisions were misguided and made before proper long-term information became available (or was deliberately hidden from view).
Unjabbed Mick (UK) We'll live longer without corrupted medical intervention.
Information is critical to have however people really need to put two and two together. Our lives are made into a hell simply by policies that are made up. It must be that most people think life is just natural to be this bad.
Jane is based on someone know really well. And yes she still with us, thankfully!!
Your story about 'Jane' demonstrates human nature and our inability to recognise our dreadful life threatening mistakes. Mick (UK)
yes I like to think that many people are not aware of what has happened and therefore I tend to try to inform but yes can understand the concern as to the now known (well some of us) repercussions.
Doing this of course has me in hot water with family etc.
My daughter’s boyfriend’s parents just took him to get the Covid booster. 🤦♀️🤦♀️ I hope he lives. Hes 16 yrs old. He’s a super young man. I almost cried when she told me this. But they’re Uber-liberal and after the past 3 1/2 years of bullshit still have a “Vote Biden-Harris” sign in their window. I have no words
That's where the culpability comes in - if you pushing it onto your child without even knowing what's in the vaccine. Actually the vaccine debacle is shwoing us humans just what a dumb and sadistic bunch we are on the whole.
That is an unbelievable story about the 16 year old. In my view, people who vote like they’re supporting a football team, are brainless! I’m a swinging voter. Keep the bastards on their toes!
Medicine is a collection of dogmas, and the dogmas themselves are said to be only reproducible 50-70% of the time. There is no law like mechanics' F=md(v)/dt, and to understand and develop it requires a steady accumulation of science and mathematics at the high school and university level.
However, in medicine, as long as you can determine whether there is a contradiction, even a layman can tackle it from any angle. Don't trust what other people say, trust your own logical thinking.
Jane may have relied a little too much on what other people said.