Discover how the Doctrine of Necessity shapes law, freedoms, and government power. Essential reading on how this principle, though crucial in crises, can threaten our rights and democracy. Must read!
Sep 4·edited Sep 4Liked by Gaz's - A Defender's Voice
Why did public health doctors specialized in public health? If you look at public health textbooks, the contents are almost like a guide for administrative officials. In short, they chose public health because they were not capable of becoming clinical doctors or surgeons, or because they were not interested in medicine itself, and because they could not become research doctors or medical scientists, but because they had the power of administrative officials and could receive bribes from the pharmaceutical industry with their licensing authority.
If you look at their backgrounds here in Japan, most of them are graduates of medical schools that always admit students who were in the middle level of elementary and junior high school. When I looked into the public health and epidemiologists involved in the vaccination decision, most of them received subsidies from pharmaceutical companies = agents of the pharmaceutical industry.
It is probably the same structure in Australia, the United States and Europe.
On the other hand, with Cov19, the late Dr. Luc Montagnie of France, Dr. Dolores Cahill of Ireland, Dr. Alexandra Henrion Caude of France and many other clear-minded molecular biologists and molecular immunologists (although far fewer than public health doctors) have been speaking out from the beginning about the ineffectiveness and danger of mRNA drugs. However, many politicians, however competent they may be, are not trained in scientific thinking, and so they do not understand the details and end up relying on the words of public health doctors. I think this is a big problem.
During that time in late 2021, and into 2022; the protest were by enlarge peaceful and as far as I had the opportunity to observe on the media and social posts, there was no justification whatsoever for the use of force of any nature! It was this deplorable conduct set me on the path of lawful resistance and push-back. If you go to the following link to one of my previous articles/videos "Government Over-Reach" you will get a feeling for my perspective on all of this https://open.substack.com/pub/oxgmcxo/p/flash-back-10?r=pf0i9&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web Have you read all of the article "The Doctrine of Necessity" and/or "Government Negligence in Pandemic Response"? Because there is no way that I believe the "Necessity" line needed to be crossed at anytime during the COVID 'pandemic'! Which, in many ways, was addressed with my video about the work of Denis Rancourt in "There was No Pandemic?" Anyway, thanks for dropping by. Best regaerds.
The term may be new but the idea of emergency powers is nested in the Doctrine. Which is obvious once you’ve read the article. Why haven’t you heard it before? Probably because the powers that be, don’t want us plebs to know the law.
The Faulty use of the PCR test to propagate the 'emergency' is apprehensible. IMO this was deliberate to generate a very high uptake of the mRNA jab (it is not a vaccine) which will have the consequence of LNP induced infertility. The imposition of this poison on children was to ensure that they never become fertile.
There is public information from several sources of the concept of world population reduction...
This [preplanned emergency] event was designed to this effect. [Fauci told Trump that there would be a health emergency in his term.]
What are the worldwide excess deaths? What is the worldwide reduction in birth rates?
Why do I see the term "Doctrine of Necessity" for the very first time today?
An open government should be open... no unconstitutional meeting behind closed doors... with no access to transcript of such. [IMO only criminals hide behind closed doors].
I remember Bill Gates saying on a program called TED a long time ago that 5 billion people is too many, so we should reduce the population. At that time, he didn't say how to reduce it. I also thought of him simply as someone who contributed to human culture with Windows. Over the past four years, I've come to understand his true intentions (making money and reducing the population).
I’ve believe I heard gates, speak of this. Once you are aware of the Doctrine of Necessity, you’ll hear the appropriate words politicians careful choose when lying, to ensure they provide some kind of out for their contentious decisions.
Why did public health doctors specialized in public health? If you look at public health textbooks, the contents are almost like a guide for administrative officials. In short, they chose public health because they were not capable of becoming clinical doctors or surgeons, or because they were not interested in medicine itself, and because they could not become research doctors or medical scientists, but because they had the power of administrative officials and could receive bribes from the pharmaceutical industry with their licensing authority.
If you look at their backgrounds here in Japan, most of them are graduates of medical schools that always admit students who were in the middle level of elementary and junior high school. When I looked into the public health and epidemiologists involved in the vaccination decision, most of them received subsidies from pharmaceutical companies = agents of the pharmaceutical industry.
It is probably the same structure in Australia, the United States and Europe.
On the other hand, with Cov19, the late Dr. Luc Montagnie of France, Dr. Dolores Cahill of Ireland, Dr. Alexandra Henrion Caude of France and many other clear-minded molecular biologists and molecular immunologists (although far fewer than public health doctors) have been speaking out from the beginning about the ineffectiveness and danger of mRNA drugs. However, many politicians, however competent they may be, are not trained in scientific thinking, and so they do not understand the details and end up relying on the words of public health doctors. I think this is a big problem.
There’s no reason to believe that lightweight ‘doctors’ indeed make up the vast majority of administrators.
When is it 'necessary' for the Australian police to microwave (cook) Covid lockdown protesters?
During that time in late 2021, and into 2022; the protest were by enlarge peaceful and as far as I had the opportunity to observe on the media and social posts, there was no justification whatsoever for the use of force of any nature! It was this deplorable conduct set me on the path of lawful resistance and push-back. If you go to the following link to one of my previous articles/videos "Government Over-Reach" you will get a feeling for my perspective on all of this https://open.substack.com/pub/oxgmcxo/p/flash-back-10?r=pf0i9&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web Have you read all of the article "The Doctrine of Necessity" and/or "Government Negligence in Pandemic Response"? Because there is no way that I believe the "Necessity" line needed to be crossed at anytime during the COVID 'pandemic'! Which, in many ways, was addressed with my video about the work of Denis Rancourt in "There was No Pandemic?" Anyway, thanks for dropping by. Best regaerds.
https://timothywiney.substack.com/p/chatgpt-takes-a-correspondence-course
The term may be new but the idea of emergency powers is nested in the Doctrine. Which is obvious once you’ve read the article. Why haven’t you heard it before? Probably because the powers that be, don’t want us plebs to know the law.
The Faulty use of the PCR test to propagate the 'emergency' is apprehensible. IMO this was deliberate to generate a very high uptake of the mRNA jab (it is not a vaccine) which will have the consequence of LNP induced infertility. The imposition of this poison on children was to ensure that they never become fertile.
There is public information from several sources of the concept of world population reduction...
This [preplanned emergency] event was designed to this effect. [Fauci told Trump that there would be a health emergency in his term.]
What are the worldwide excess deaths? What is the worldwide reduction in birth rates?
Why do I see the term "Doctrine of Necessity" for the very first time today?
An open government should be open... no unconstitutional meeting behind closed doors... with no access to transcript of such. [IMO only criminals hide behind closed doors].
I remember Bill Gates saying on a program called TED a long time ago that 5 billion people is too many, so we should reduce the population. At that time, he didn't say how to reduce it. I also thought of him simply as someone who contributed to human culture with Windows. Over the past four years, I've come to understand his true intentions (making money and reducing the population).
I’ve believe I heard gates, speak of this. Once you are aware of the Doctrine of Necessity, you’ll hear the appropriate words politicians careful choose when lying, to ensure they provide some kind of out for their contentious decisions.