10 Comments
User's avatar
Barry O'Kenyan's avatar

I read some relevant sections of the judgement.

The case was NOT about the merits or otherwise of Dr Bay's views on convid's "vaccines". . Rather the case showed that Dr Bay was not afforded due process; APHRA and the Medical Board act beyond their powers - that is, they did not have the power to do what they did.

If the feral govts want to, they could simply amend the powers of APHRA and the Medical Board to muzzle Dr Bay and other brave real doctors.

Yes, speak up and act in numbers are the only peaceful and proper ways to make changes. For example, had only 30% of critical workers such as quacks, nurses, police, paramedics, transport said no to vaccines, lockdowns, etc, those measures would have not been implemented.

Hungary had to close its "vaccine" centres because 30% of the people gave them the finger!

I still cringe when I recall how bogans parrot the lies. Back Nov 2021 when they let us out after almost all had two jabs, a bogan, who was carrying a small slab, proudly said he had two. When I said none!, he went feral and said I could die from crossing the road right then. I shut his mouth by pointing out that he could also die by crossing the road right then! He walked away, miffed; and looked at me!

I thought bogans would not believe anything they could not see eat or drink!

Expand full comment
Gaz's - A Defender's Voice's avatar

You’ve raised an excellent point about the ruling’s implications, and I think it’s important to dig deeper into what it really represents. While it’s true the judgment didn’t directly address the merits of Dr. Bay’s views on COVID-19 vaccines, it strongly affirmed a principle we can’t ignore: the fundamental right to dissent against government policies without fear of unjust retaliation. That freedom is critical in any democracy, especially when it comes to challenging public health measures that have far-reaching consequences.

Your concern about governments potentially amending the powers of regulatory bodies like AHPRA to silence dissent is completely valid. It’s a reminder of how easily systems of power can adapt to suppress those who speak out. That’s why your call to act in numbers is so powerful. Just imagine—if 30% of critical workers had stood together and refused to comply, it could have entirely shifted the trajectory of vaccine mandates and lockdowns. The example of Hungary is proof that collective resistance can make a real difference.

I also couldn’t agree more with your anecdote about the reactions you’ve experienced—it perfectly highlights how fear and misinformation turned people against each other during the pandemic. The way dissent was vilified only shows how much we need rulings like this one. They remind us that dissent isn’t just a right—it’s essential for questioning narratives and holding power accountable.

This ruling gives us a foothold to push for broader accountability, but it’s also a call to action. We need to ensure these principles are upheld and expanded. Together, we have the strength to demand truth and fairness, no matter how strongly those in power may resist. You’re absolutely right—speaking up and standing together are the only peaceful ways to create real change.

Expand full comment
Mediocrates's avatar

At last - justice prevails! If AHPRA has any sense of moral duty they will immediately reinstate every Australian health professional that was oppressed and silenced during the Covid era.

Expand full comment
BigpondGeefor's avatar

Thanks Gaz, it reminds me of the Berlin Wall collapse. Now the instigators will be busy blaming their lackeys for all the bad decisions. I really believe the best approach is a second Nuremberg trials. Maniacs like Gates are still out their doing all the damage they can.

Expand full comment
Gaz's - A Defender's Voice's avatar

I fully agree with your comment emphasizing the need for accountability, as it reflects the core of ethical and moral principles in any lawful society. Your point about ensuring justice and transparency is a crucial reminder that no matter how immense the shadow powers or systemic interference, we must hold fast to what is right and just.

While the SETIC’s reply touches on important aspects, it’s essential to focus on the deeper ethical and moral foundation of this issue. Upholding accountability isn’t merely about exposing wrongdoers but about preserving the integrity of law and morality for the betterment of humanity. True justice requires courage and persistence, even in the face of powerful opposition, and your call for accountability resonates deeply with those who value truth over compromise. Let us continue to advocate for what’s right, undeterred by the forces seeking to obscure it.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Dec 13
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Gaz's - A Defender's Voice's avatar

You’re absolutely right—the Nuremberg trials served as a staged spectacle, punishing a few while allowing key players to evade true accountability. I’m very aware of Operation Paperclip and how it exposed the disturbing reality of powerful interests prioritizing their agendas over justice. It’s a stark reminder of how easily morality can be sidelined when shadow powers intervene.

Expand full comment
BigpondGeefor's avatar

There were thousands of Nazis, it was impractical to punish them all but they hopefully made a sample of public disapproval of the principals. Looking back now on the Covid fantasy, Klaus Schwab brainwashed the principals of many countries who imagined they were doing good things. It is astonishing that national leaders could be so deceived, but they were - and are. Little inquiry would reveal that here in Australia there was no crisis. It was all fantasy and had the authorities relied on our Constitution, rule of law and Ivermectin it would have been an amusing non event.

Expand full comment
Freedom2Choose's avatar

Shared. Fantastic news!!

Expand full comment
Solveig Warren's avatar

I was thrilled reading of your success and the thought of finally exposure of the fraudulent behaviours is brilliant. I had an aortic episode May -23 due to being born with bicuspid heart valve unknown to me. I had open heart surgery middle June -23 as condition was critical however concerned as hadn't had any shots of Covid and was worried about possible blood transfusion. I declined any flu shots from 2014 onwards. Following and supporting all dedicated medics. Sadly been rejected by my family for my opinions. I am a truth seeker / speaker plus whistleblower of decades...

Expand full comment
Gaz's - A Defender's Voice's avatar

Thank you for your heartfelt message and for sharing your journey—it’s people like you, brave truth-seekers and whistleblowers, who help pave the way for real change. I am deeply sorry to hear about the challenges you’ve faced, especially with your health and the difficult rejection from your family. Please know that your courage and dedication to truth are valued and admired. Stay strong, as your voice and resilience inspire others, including those who stand with you in seeking justice and exposing deception. You are not alone in this fight!

Expand full comment