When truth is censored, freedom dies. Governments and corporations suppress dissent, twist facts, and silence debate to protect their power. Who benefits? Demand accountability—before it’s too late.
So well said Gaz. Their can be no doubt about the veracity of your words when the plethora of verifiable evidence is encountered first hand. Rebekah's latest report is material indictment of your point:
FOI accessed internal emails reveal the TGA's incorrigible response to LNP-DNA transfection risks in modRNA experiment.
With the evidence now incontrovertible . . that all vax recipients were knowingly placed in egregious and irrevocable harms way by the conscious choices the TGA made to protect it's own interests - when will the Government and Judiciary take action on behalf of the people to whom their duty is to serve ? And when will mainstream journalism regard truth as news-worthy ? Rhetorical questions of course - complete renovation required.
Thank you for your insightful comment and for highlighting Rebekah Barnett’s recent investigative report. Her work has indeed brought to light serious concerns regarding the Therapeutic Goods Administration’s (TGA) handling of DNA contamination risks in mRNA vaccines.
The internal emails obtained through Freedom of Information (FOI) requests reveal that the TGA was aware of the potential for vaccine-derived DNA fragments to integrate into the human genome. Despite this knowledge, the agency publicly maintained that such integration was not possible, thereby presenting a misleading narrative to the public.
This discrepancy between internal communications and public statements is deeply troubling. It suggests a deliberate effort to downplay potential risks associated with the vaccines, prioritizing the agency’s interests over public health and transparency.
The question now arises: when will the government and judiciary take decisive action to hold the TGA accountable for these actions? Furthermore, it’s imperative for mainstream journalism to recognize the significance of these findings and pursue the truth with the rigor and integrity that the public deserves.
As you aptly noted, these are rhetorical questions that underscore the need for comprehensive reform. The current situation calls for a thorough reassessment of regulatory practices to ensure that public health agencies operate with the transparency and accountability necessary to maintain public trust.
Nearly 65 years after the assassination of John F. Kennedy, the continued withholding of critical files raises troubling parallels to a broader and escalating crisis in transparency and accountability. In any free society, the open exchange of ideas and evidence is the cornerstone of justice, as seen in the courtroom where truth emerges through the balanced contest of opposing arguments. Yet, as with the COVID-19 crisis, we now see governments, corporations, and powerful interests striving to control the narrative, silencing dissent and suppressing evidence to protect their agendas. What are they so afraid of?
The refusal to release the full JFK files echoes the current manipulation of public discourse surrounding COVID-19 and mRNA vaccines. Just as the government claimed certainty in the lone gunman theory, they assured us these vaccines were “safe and effective.” In both cases, critical voices and uncomfortable truths were buried under propaganda and censorship. Evidence of adverse effects, once dismissed as “misinformation,” is now surfacing, revealing patterns of harm that demand scrutiny. Similarly, the withheld JFK files likely contain information that would undermine official narratives and expose systemic failures or complicity.
The government’s insistence on withholding the JFK files, much like their suppression of data on vaccine risks, demonstrates a disturbing trend: the fear of transparency. In both scenarios, the stakes are immense—public trust, institutional credibility, and the potential unraveling of entrenched power structures. By denying access to these files and silencing dissenting voices, they betray the principles of democracy, eroding the capacity for collective truth-seeking and debate.
This creeping authoritarianism threatens not only our ability to understand the past but also our ability to confront the present. If the truth about JFK’s assassination remains hidden, what precedent does this set for addressing the controversies of today? If governments and corporations continue to dictate what can and cannot be questioned, how can society hold them accountable for the harm they perpetuate? The parallels are stark and alarming: in both cases, silence and suppression serve as shields for those in power, at the expense of justice and the public good.
We must reject this dangerous consolidation of control over truth, whether it concerns the assassination of a president or the health of billions. The time for passive acceptance is over. Demand the release of the JFK files. Demand answers about the risks of mRNA vaccines. Demand a society where no single entity—government, corporate, or otherwise—can monopolize the truth. Anything less threatens the very foundation of freedom and justice that defines a democratic society.
The only country with a semblance of free speech is USA, provided the cousins of the Arabs are not dissed.
(A while back I came across a Jewish couple - they migrated from USA - and I asked them "Who is a Semite?" They said themselves and their Arab cousins. Then I responded with "Anti-Semite....?" They looked at each other uncomfortably.!)
Everywhere else in the West, "free speech" is gone. Look at the feral UK and Germany,
So well said Gaz. Their can be no doubt about the veracity of your words when the plethora of verifiable evidence is encountered first hand. Rebekah's latest report is material indictment of your point:
[ https://news.rebekahbarnett.com.au/p/bombshell-australian-drug-regulator ] . .
FOI accessed internal emails reveal the TGA's incorrigible response to LNP-DNA transfection risks in modRNA experiment.
With the evidence now incontrovertible . . that all vax recipients were knowingly placed in egregious and irrevocable harms way by the conscious choices the TGA made to protect it's own interests - when will the Government and Judiciary take action on behalf of the people to whom their duty is to serve ? And when will mainstream journalism regard truth as news-worthy ? Rhetorical questions of course - complete renovation required.
Thank you for your insightful comment and for highlighting Rebekah Barnett’s recent investigative report. Her work has indeed brought to light serious concerns regarding the Therapeutic Goods Administration’s (TGA) handling of DNA contamination risks in mRNA vaccines.
The internal emails obtained through Freedom of Information (FOI) requests reveal that the TGA was aware of the potential for vaccine-derived DNA fragments to integrate into the human genome. Despite this knowledge, the agency publicly maintained that such integration was not possible, thereby presenting a misleading narrative to the public.
This discrepancy between internal communications and public statements is deeply troubling. It suggests a deliberate effort to downplay potential risks associated with the vaccines, prioritizing the agency’s interests over public health and transparency.
The question now arises: when will the government and judiciary take decisive action to hold the TGA accountable for these actions? Furthermore, it’s imperative for mainstream journalism to recognize the significance of these findings and pursue the truth with the rigor and integrity that the public deserves.
As you aptly noted, these are rhetorical questions that underscore the need for comprehensive reform. The current situation calls for a thorough reassessment of regulatory practices to ensure that public health agencies operate with the transparency and accountability necessary to maintain public trust.
We are still waiting for all the JFK files 65 years after his death. What is the government afraid of?
Nearly 65 years after the assassination of John F. Kennedy, the continued withholding of critical files raises troubling parallels to a broader and escalating crisis in transparency and accountability. In any free society, the open exchange of ideas and evidence is the cornerstone of justice, as seen in the courtroom where truth emerges through the balanced contest of opposing arguments. Yet, as with the COVID-19 crisis, we now see governments, corporations, and powerful interests striving to control the narrative, silencing dissent and suppressing evidence to protect their agendas. What are they so afraid of?
The refusal to release the full JFK files echoes the current manipulation of public discourse surrounding COVID-19 and mRNA vaccines. Just as the government claimed certainty in the lone gunman theory, they assured us these vaccines were “safe and effective.” In both cases, critical voices and uncomfortable truths were buried under propaganda and censorship. Evidence of adverse effects, once dismissed as “misinformation,” is now surfacing, revealing patterns of harm that demand scrutiny. Similarly, the withheld JFK files likely contain information that would undermine official narratives and expose systemic failures or complicity.
The government’s insistence on withholding the JFK files, much like their suppression of data on vaccine risks, demonstrates a disturbing trend: the fear of transparency. In both scenarios, the stakes are immense—public trust, institutional credibility, and the potential unraveling of entrenched power structures. By denying access to these files and silencing dissenting voices, they betray the principles of democracy, eroding the capacity for collective truth-seeking and debate.
This creeping authoritarianism threatens not only our ability to understand the past but also our ability to confront the present. If the truth about JFK’s assassination remains hidden, what precedent does this set for addressing the controversies of today? If governments and corporations continue to dictate what can and cannot be questioned, how can society hold them accountable for the harm they perpetuate? The parallels are stark and alarming: in both cases, silence and suppression serve as shields for those in power, at the expense of justice and the public good.
We must reject this dangerous consolidation of control over truth, whether it concerns the assassination of a president or the health of billions. The time for passive acceptance is over. Demand the release of the JFK files. Demand answers about the risks of mRNA vaccines. Demand a society where no single entity—government, corporate, or otherwise—can monopolize the truth. Anything less threatens the very foundation of freedom and justice that defines a democratic society.
Well said. You should write a book. I’ll be the first to buy it.
The only country with a semblance of free speech is USA, provided the cousins of the Arabs are not dissed.
(A while back I came across a Jewish couple - they migrated from USA - and I asked them "Who is a Semite?" They said themselves and their Arab cousins. Then I responded with "Anti-Semite....?" They looked at each other uncomfortably.!)
Everywhere else in the West, "free speech" is gone. Look at the feral UK and Germany,