Albanese faces a grave choice: act on damning evidence of COVID-19 vaccine contamination, or risk public health, political ruin, and catastrophic legal fallout. Will he protect us or fail us?
Seriously, unfortunately I don’t believe he will act. All our governments since Gough Whitlam have been working for the IN and the new world order- not we the people. The government is currently funding five of these tox factories around Australia, and I read yesterday that a QLD group has received millions in pharma funding for Bird Flu vaccine trial for a non existing disease.
Julie, I understand your pessimism. I get down about the situation as well. I urge you to read the legal points again. And please share the heck out of this or and one’s work that aims to alert Australians. While there are certain people you can never budge from their wilful blindness, the are many more that will listen to logic and reason. Please help me.
Respectfully, the Biosecurity Act 2015, was amended in 2021, when everybody was busy watching the other governmental glove. And I think you'll find it's not what it was sold to the public as. Also, I suggest having a look at the status of any/all "public health emergency" powers, in each of the states. People assumed an awful lot of these things got "cancelled" or rolled back, when in fact they just got put on autopilot. I'd be interested to hear from the VERY silent Australian military, in regards to their obligations under "civil" uprisings.😐🤐
Finally, "credible evidence of harm", and there in a nutshell lies the escape clause, particularly with the new "mis, dis, mal information" governmental maneuvering. Who now decides what denotes the term "credible evidence"?😐🤔🤨
Local government are the only form of government actually answerable to the people- because they have to look the public in the face, everyday, and their constituents know where they live. Higher governments, have set themselves up to be bureacratically deaf to the people.
But unfortunately, the military answers not to local government....😉
Ps- did anyone notice Albo's very unsurprised look when he was handed the letter? I did.
Hi Barefoothealer, are you referring to the Biosecurity Amendment (Enhanced Risk Management) Bill 2021? If you are, that Bill lapsed at the end of parliament on the 25 July 2022. There is another amendment call the BIOSECURITY AMENDMENT (STRENGTHENING BIOSECURITY) ACT 2022. Though, without having a close look seems to be focused of agriculture?
I’ve recently read about the Japanese Replicon mRNA ( developed by our CSIRO and an unheard of Us pharma, and the monkeypox vaccine - both able to infect and kill unvaccinated. My pessimism is not improving.
I hope I am not sticking my nose in here - my apologies if I am, but is this what you are after? Kind Regards, DDB
>
FDA Approves Vaccine for Mpox — Warns It May Cause Death in Vaccinated and People They Come in Contact With
ACAM2000, a vaccine approved last month by the FDA for mpox, comes with a list of “serious complications,” including myocarditis, death and fetal death. The FDA’s medication guide also warns that people who receive the vaccine may spread it to unvaccinated people, who also risk developing vaccine side effects, including death.
Hello Geoff, I got my facebook page disabled by Mr. Zuckerberg in April, 2024 for posting too much truth and shockingly recently, I I was on X for 12 days and same thing happened - are you able to send me that info (not on the x link as I can't even read anything) on the squamous cell carcinoma - fluoride poison. My husband got that in the 5th year of fluoridation extensive surgeries, after appalling failure of GP's to diagnose (they even said it wasn't cancer). After the 4th surgery and the 30 doses radiation , and hospital acquired golden staph infection that also nearly killed him , then he got parkinson's disease. Kind regards Geoff, Diane Drayton Buckland, Kallangur.
Hello Diane, great to hear from you. I was reading one of your reports just yesterday in preparation for another article. Sorry to hear about your husband. I will send you some information today. Zuckerberg and his wife suspended my Facebook page as well.
Albanese will get legal and expert advice on this letter. The legal advice will say he cannot be touched by legal action (which is obvious, since otherwise the letter's senders would be relying on legal action in the first place). The expert advice will say it's all hogwash and the people doing the analysis have no expertise - rather the real experts are on the government's side (which many will be if only to protect their research grants and academic careers).
t's definitely frustrating when political figures seem insulated from accountability, especially when they can rely on legal loopholes or expert opinions aligned with their interests. However, history shows that sometimes a notice or warning that was initially dismissed can later prove to be true and factual. In such cases, if the party being notified fails to act, there can be serious repercussions down the line—both legally and reputationally. For instance, in corporate law or public policy, when a company or government ignores early warnings about safety risks or environmental concerns, they may face consequences when those risks materialize and public opinion shifts. In such cases, even though legal protections may have seemed impenetrable at the time, they can be weakened by the emergence of new facts or shifts in public and political pressure. While it’s common for governments to rely on their own experts, the truth tends to surface eventually, and accountability has a way of catching up. Do you think there might be value in pushing for continued scrutiny, even if initial responses seem dismissive?
As for your example, if someone fails to act on a notice that is later found to be true, the party at fault can often face repercussions when the facts are validated. Take, for instance, corporate whistleblowing cases, where early warnings about unethical practices were ignored but later proved true, leading to public scandals, legal penalties, or financial fallout for those involved. Even if legal defenses hold initially, there’s always a risk that truth and accountability will emerge with time.
I agree with the (ex-Liberal, now Independent) MP Russell Broadbent (and yourself) that something *should* be done. However, this is Australia. Civil Unrest will not occur if Albo ignores this letter and does nothing. He's ignored loads of things before and nothing happened! Not acting on this letter is also NOTHING compared to the human rights violations that went on during the height of covid; we had the human rights commission and union heads saying that it was OK to mandate jabs!! Like this letter will make anyone do anything now, 4.5 years later. Even the judges are bought in this country. Look how few people got their jobs back - with backpay - due to the mandated covid jabs. Most people were told they had 'no standing' or their cases were thrown out.
The answer is that Albo will fail us. He has been failing us before he had himself crowned PM (and that was before the votes were properly counted, too) and he has only failed us since. He will only ever fail us because that it all he is capable of. I'm not sure if it's because he's a Pisces or just a worm of a man. Any which way, he's horrid, and the only way he will desist is if polls show him to be universally hated and he's got no chance of winning an election and/or Albo asks the GG to call for a double dissolution and/or the GG asks King Charles to intervene!
But the GG, Sam Mostyn, is a personal friend of Albo's. She's worked with him before! And he's been so generous and upped her pay packet by 43% to over $700K/yr. How can you get cranky with Albo if he does that for you?! So I think Albo will just ignore this letter and knows that the GG won't do anything bad (she's also a Republican so she won't go whinging to Charles!).
Unless we have a million people walking on Parliament House (whilst it's sitting) carrying torches, pitchforks and Molotov cocktails, I think I can safely say that NOTHING is going to change Arsehole Albo's mind! Not science. Not a letter. Not anything legal. Hell, this guy will DIE before he publicly agrees that he was wrong about covid! Or anything!
Thank you for sharing your thoughts, and I certainly understand the frustration many feel toward the political landscape in Australia, particularly regarding the handling of COVID-19 and the consequences of mandates. However, while I agree that the situation can appear disheartening, I believe there is still significant value in letters like the one from Russell Broadbent, particularly when they raise serious public health concerns.
Firstly, whether or not this specific letter leads to immediate change, it’s critical that issues like vaccine safety and accountability are raised in formal, documented ways. These efforts contribute to public discourse and create a record that can be referred to later, even if action isn’t immediate. It may not seem like much now, but these formal notices hold power, especially when the stakes involve public health and government responsibility. History shows that systemic change often starts with incremental steps like these—persistent efforts that eventually gain momentum.
You’re absolutely right to point out the challenges we face, from ignored warnings to questionable human rights practices during the pandemic. But I’d argue that this is precisely why ongoing pressure and formal accountability are so important. Even if civil unrest doesn’t erupt, public engagement and awareness do make a difference over time. Silence only guarantees more inaction, while persistent advocacy at least keeps the conversation alive and may influence future decisions.
Regarding Albo’s past behavior and possible future inaction, I understand your skepticism, and it may indeed feel like a long shot. However, giving up entirely and resorting to extreme measures only weakens legitimate efforts for change. We need to encourage legal, transparent, and well-organized approaches to hold leadership accountable. While change may be slow, it is still achievable through continuous civic engagement, voting, and encouraging others to be informed.
Lastly, I’d argue that the strength of a democracy lies in its citizens’ ability to continuously push for better governance. As challenging as the current political situation is, it’s important that we don’t succumb to complete cynicism or lose faith in the power of our voices. Each step toward accountability, no matter how small, is still a step forward.
Thank you again for your perspective, and I hope we can continue to advocate for meaningful change.
There are always people out there like Russell Broadbent who are willing to do things the more 'proper' way, and pursue justice in above-board forms. I think that's a good thing - because as you've correctly written, it documents concerns and can thus allow for things to change slowly but surely over time.
Unfortunately, most of the political things I've seen changing 'slowly but surely over time' have been BAD with further bad changes cemented in on top of those, making them harder to roll back.
I appreciate that Russell Broadbent is taking up the fight. There are a number of politicians doing that now, and Albo is starting to look a bit uneasy. However, he has friends in high (low!) places and he won't be quitting any time soon.
I can see both sides of the story here, Gaz, and I agree that it usually helps to continually push for better governance. However, it also helps to be able to understand when that system is broken and when you might need to resort to other measures. So by all means, we should pursue justice in an above-board manner, but we should also be prepared for more underhanded tactics from these same bastards who will not let others in so the system can be democratically changed! It's not a fair fight if they're not playing by the rules. And sometimes you have to break a few rules, too, if you want to win. And that, my friend, is a very fine line to tread - because when does one become as bad as the other side through those measures...?
But one must know when enough is enough. I think there is always that line in the sand. And Labor & Co (ie the big parties + Greens) are getting really close to crossing that line again. They crossed it during covid. Therefore these same people cannot be trusted EVER AGAIN in my books. Some lines must never be crossed. And they are trying SO HARD to cross it again. So I personally am running out of patience, and if someone asked me the way to Parliament House so they could destroy it, I'd gladly show them the way. People make their beds and they lie in them, Gaz. The majority of politicians in this country have been making very bad beds indeed and I have no real urge to save them.
I'm all for meaningful change, but how can one have meaningful change when 95% of the system is corrupt, even the judges?!
I think you are foolishly hopeful. It will take more than a letter or three to make the positive sweeping changes this country so desperately needs. And yes, these changes have to come from its citizens. The same citizens who are just about exhausted from the merry-go-round of pain that the politicians keep subjecting us to.
I have written to SO MANY politicians in my time, including Russell Broadbent recently. I've gone to rallies, spoken at rallies, signed countless petitions, written lots of Submissions for Bills, am part of a think tank that sends out media releases etc. I want positive change, like many, and I've put a lot of effort into it in my time - because I think people need to exercise their civic duties!. But I also don't want us to have a revolution. And perhaps that's the problem. Maybe we DO need civil unrest, and even a revolution. We need to tell these pollies once and for all who's boss: certainly not them! THEY work for US. Theoretically, that's how it's meant to work, but I'm not sure it ever did. And unless we're willing to fight for it, then we will never own it.
Everyone needs to know when to salvage things and when to abandon ship. And if more disastrous bills get passed in this country, and other bad ones are not rolled back, then we have no country worth saving anymore. And that is mostly because not enough people have tried to save it. I know I've tried. If everyone took as active an interest as I have, then we'd be a great country. But people are inherently lazy and want everything on a platter. I can't make enough people care, Gaz, about anything, no matter how hard I try.
It's even quite possible that we NEED terrible times to make people give a shit again! If they ever did give a shit, that is, given we're a penal colony...
Thank you for your thoughtful observations, which I believe are very insightful. I truly appreciate the balanced perspective you’ve provided, especially on the need for continuous, above-board action. While you mention I might be “foolishly hopeful,” I take that as a compliment—it speaks to the belief that hope, however difficult, remains a powerful force for change. I completely agree that civil unrest is not the answer. Instead, we must continue to mobilize peaceful, determined pushback, just as you’ve been doing through your advocacy, petitions, and active civic engagement. It’s through these sustained, principled efforts that we can build momentum for positive change, even if it feels like an uphill battle.
It's pointless suggesting this PM should act for ethical reasons - ethics as normally understiood mean nothing to socialists. It's also pointless making dark sugestions of civil unrest to follow. The socialist elites who run Australia have contingency plans in place for civil unrest. They have a newly-militarised police force fully armed with advanced crowd control and surveillance technology at the ready. Civil unrest will be crushed ruthlessly should it become a credible threat.
I understand your frustration, and it's easy to feel disillusioned when the systems in place seem so deeply entrenched. If we agree that calling for ethical leadership might not resonate with certain ideologies, then perhaps the focus needs to shift towards more pragmatic approaches. One potential alternative is to work within the legal and democratic frameworks available, supporting reforms that decentralize power or push for greater accountability through checks and balances. Another option is to build strong, independent institutions and community-driven initiatives that can operate outside traditional political structures. Civic education and fostering local engagement could help empower individuals to take more control of their lives and communities, diminishing the influence of any one political elite. Although the obstacles are significant, sustained pressure through peaceful, organized advocacy often leads to lasting change. What are your thoughts on this approach?
As far as I know, yes. It was, we were told, distributed via internal Parliamentary means. The PM was noticed and therefore, the whole of government! No one should underestimate the relevance of this.
Just my cynical take on things, but Albanese will not consciously choose to either protect or fail the public. Like most self-selecting 'leaders' beyond the scale of local communities, regardless of political ideology, he is a Cluster B sociopath ... high on a scale of narcissistic, opportunistic, and psychopathic behavior traits. A god-king, and in his own mind, the center of the universe. To the likes of him — people, their laws, and language itself are just exploitable resources. In a New World Order, I could imagine him and Kamala Harris as running mates in the kabuki show of democratic elections. Trump is no better. Or Kishida.
Steve, I believe you take on Albanese, seems reasonable. Most of his vote winning promise during the election have amounted to naught. Cost of living up, power prices through the roof, and nothing done about the debacle COVID response … in fact he’s overseen a continuation of the COVID absurdity!
There is no legal requirement for a document to explicitly include the word “notice” for it to function as one. The key factor is whether the document clearly conveys the important matters or issues, thereby fulfilling the purpose of providing notice.
The letter to Prime Minister Albanese sufficiently outlines the relevant concerns, such as vaccine contamination and related risks, and clearly informs him of the situation, therefore it can be considered that he has been “noticed.” The content and intent of the communication is what matters legally, not the specific terminology used.
This letter, for Australians, begs the question why other countries aren’t doing the same, (ie: Canada).
There is the case, as I’d described above, about the Quebec former lawyer bringing a class action lawsuit, but Health Canada needs to be held to account, and where’s all the research money to start doing genotoxicity, carcinotoxicity and long term studies from the pharmaceutical companies. I would not trust the Pharma companies to do the studies and testing it they should be coughing up all that profit they got from these gene therapy agents to have others, more trusted scientists do the studies
Are not the 'Liberals' [and their Corporate associates that unlawfully enforced actions] that purchased these products under 'secret' contract also fully liable?
Suing them in their private capacity, is without doubt, the way to go. As soon as they step out of their officer status and functions… into them. Easy said than done of course!
The only problem to the lawfare against the government, is the government has an endless supply of taxpayer dollars and the largest law office with thousands of lawyers at their disposal. What we have to do is sue them personally so it comes out of their pockets to defend themselves. Most politicians say, “bring it on” knowingly they will get the best of the best to defend them. See Gloriane Blais, former Quebec lawyer in class action lawsuit against a lot of politicians, but she’s suing them personally in their private capacity
Shared, so many won't read it of course, I'm surely blocked from news organisations by now, but I send these things anyway. I dare say the journalists choose to ignore these things, why I do not know... Something tells me they are either as brainwashed as the rest of the population via exposure to mainstream reporting overseas, in a groupthink scenario or are literally told they can not touch this subject.
If this was on the news, in the light it should be, the outrage would be huge, and in that sense maybe this is part of the reason. But people have a right to know before they next roll up their sleeve, so their silence on the matter is criminal.
Probably why the govt needs the new censorship bill rushed through, and why mainstream media have a deal that they are immune to this bill. Seriously it can't be a law, with fines, if some people are exempt, it must cover all... This is the dystopia we are in.
Hats off to Minister Broadbent for standing up, what a legend.
Not surprised that they did that to him, can't have party members going against the narrative... The two party system is so infiltrated by big business and other organisations ... Three if we count the "Greens".
It's great to be hopeful and positive. Truth and love prevails in spirit. But the last few years have demonstrated that the people with the guns win here. Politicians are clowns. The military (paramilitary ) have the guns , they enforce the decisions. The Australian military take orders from their masters . We could look towards those people . It used to be the queen, who are the unaccountable now?
Seriously, unfortunately I don’t believe he will act. All our governments since Gough Whitlam have been working for the IN and the new world order- not we the people. The government is currently funding five of these tox factories around Australia, and I read yesterday that a QLD group has received millions in pharma funding for Bird Flu vaccine trial for a non existing disease.
Julie, I understand your pessimism. I get down about the situation as well. I urge you to read the legal points again. And please share the heck out of this or and one’s work that aims to alert Australians. While there are certain people you can never budge from their wilful blindness, the are many more that will listen to logic and reason. Please help me.
Respectfully, the Biosecurity Act 2015, was amended in 2021, when everybody was busy watching the other governmental glove. And I think you'll find it's not what it was sold to the public as. Also, I suggest having a look at the status of any/all "public health emergency" powers, in each of the states. People assumed an awful lot of these things got "cancelled" or rolled back, when in fact they just got put on autopilot. I'd be interested to hear from the VERY silent Australian military, in regards to their obligations under "civil" uprisings.😐🤐
Finally, "credible evidence of harm", and there in a nutshell lies the escape clause, particularly with the new "mis, dis, mal information" governmental maneuvering. Who now decides what denotes the term "credible evidence"?😐🤔🤨
Local government are the only form of government actually answerable to the people- because they have to look the public in the face, everyday, and their constituents know where they live. Higher governments, have set themselves up to be bureacratically deaf to the people.
But unfortunately, the military answers not to local government....😉
Ps- did anyone notice Albo's very unsurprised look when he was handed the letter? I did.
Hi Barefoothealer, are you referring to the Biosecurity Amendment (Enhanced Risk Management) Bill 2021? If you are, that Bill lapsed at the end of parliament on the 25 July 2022. There is another amendment call the BIOSECURITY AMENDMENT (STRENGTHENING BIOSECURITY) ACT 2022. Though, without having a close look seems to be focused of agriculture?
I’ve recently read about the Japanese Replicon mRNA ( developed by our CSIRO and an unheard of Us pharma, and the monkeypox vaccine - both able to infect and kill unvaccinated. My pessimism is not improving.
Do you have a link?
I hope I am not sticking my nose in here - my apologies if I am, but is this what you are after? Kind Regards, DDB
>
FDA Approves Vaccine for Mpox — Warns It May Cause Death in Vaccinated and People They Come in Contact With
ACAM2000, a vaccine approved last month by the FDA for mpox, comes with a list of “serious complications,” including myocarditis, death and fetal death. The FDA’s medication guide also warns that people who receive the vaccine may spread it to unvaccinated people, who also risk developing vaccine side effects, including death.
by Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D.
September 17, 2024
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/fda-acam2000-mpox-vaccine-warning-death-unvaccinated/
See >
WHO greenlights mpox vaccine for babies in Africa – despite no prior clinical trials
22 September, 2024
https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-09-22-who-greenlights-mpox-vaccine-even-to-babies.html
I believe you can find it on Aussie pharma 17
I’m doing my best Gaz.
Thanks.
David Speicher has published on Endotoxin in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma in collaboration with Griffith University
https://x.com/FluoridePoison/status/1836922382042419523
Hello Geoff, I got my facebook page disabled by Mr. Zuckerberg in April, 2024 for posting too much truth and shockingly recently, I I was on X for 12 days and same thing happened - are you able to send me that info (not on the x link as I can't even read anything) on the squamous cell carcinoma - fluoride poison. My husband got that in the 5th year of fluoridation extensive surgeries, after appalling failure of GP's to diagnose (they even said it wasn't cancer). After the 4th surgery and the 30 doses radiation , and hospital acquired golden staph infection that also nearly killed him , then he got parkinson's disease. Kind regards Geoff, Diane Drayton Buckland, Kallangur.
Hello Diane, great to hear from you. I was reading one of your reports just yesterday in preparation for another article. Sorry to hear about your husband. I will send you some information today. Zuckerberg and his wife suspended my Facebook page as well.
Albanese will get legal and expert advice on this letter. The legal advice will say he cannot be touched by legal action (which is obvious, since otherwise the letter's senders would be relying on legal action in the first place). The expert advice will say it's all hogwash and the people doing the analysis have no expertise - rather the real experts are on the government's side (which many will be if only to protect their research grants and academic careers).
t's definitely frustrating when political figures seem insulated from accountability, especially when they can rely on legal loopholes or expert opinions aligned with their interests. However, history shows that sometimes a notice or warning that was initially dismissed can later prove to be true and factual. In such cases, if the party being notified fails to act, there can be serious repercussions down the line—both legally and reputationally. For instance, in corporate law or public policy, when a company or government ignores early warnings about safety risks or environmental concerns, they may face consequences when those risks materialize and public opinion shifts. In such cases, even though legal protections may have seemed impenetrable at the time, they can be weakened by the emergence of new facts or shifts in public and political pressure. While it’s common for governments to rely on their own experts, the truth tends to surface eventually, and accountability has a way of catching up. Do you think there might be value in pushing for continued scrutiny, even if initial responses seem dismissive?
As for your example, if someone fails to act on a notice that is later found to be true, the party at fault can often face repercussions when the facts are validated. Take, for instance, corporate whistleblowing cases, where early warnings about unethical practices were ignored but later proved true, leading to public scandals, legal penalties, or financial fallout for those involved. Even if legal defenses hold initially, there’s always a risk that truth and accountability will emerge with time.
I agree with the (ex-Liberal, now Independent) MP Russell Broadbent (and yourself) that something *should* be done. However, this is Australia. Civil Unrest will not occur if Albo ignores this letter and does nothing. He's ignored loads of things before and nothing happened! Not acting on this letter is also NOTHING compared to the human rights violations that went on during the height of covid; we had the human rights commission and union heads saying that it was OK to mandate jabs!! Like this letter will make anyone do anything now, 4.5 years later. Even the judges are bought in this country. Look how few people got their jobs back - with backpay - due to the mandated covid jabs. Most people were told they had 'no standing' or their cases were thrown out.
The answer is that Albo will fail us. He has been failing us before he had himself crowned PM (and that was before the votes were properly counted, too) and he has only failed us since. He will only ever fail us because that it all he is capable of. I'm not sure if it's because he's a Pisces or just a worm of a man. Any which way, he's horrid, and the only way he will desist is if polls show him to be universally hated and he's got no chance of winning an election and/or Albo asks the GG to call for a double dissolution and/or the GG asks King Charles to intervene!
https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/politics/concerns-raised-over-incoming-governorgeneral-sam-mostyns-close-personal-relationship-with-anthony-albanese/news-story/d6af7ed812829196c1e44fe01e4aa121
But the GG, Sam Mostyn, is a personal friend of Albo's. She's worked with him before! And he's been so generous and upped her pay packet by 43% to over $700K/yr. How can you get cranky with Albo if he does that for you?! So I think Albo will just ignore this letter and knows that the GG won't do anything bad (she's also a Republican so she won't go whinging to Charles!).
Unless we have a million people walking on Parliament House (whilst it's sitting) carrying torches, pitchforks and Molotov cocktails, I think I can safely say that NOTHING is going to change Arsehole Albo's mind! Not science. Not a letter. Not anything legal. Hell, this guy will DIE before he publicly agrees that he was wrong about covid! Or anything!
Thank you for sharing your thoughts, and I certainly understand the frustration many feel toward the political landscape in Australia, particularly regarding the handling of COVID-19 and the consequences of mandates. However, while I agree that the situation can appear disheartening, I believe there is still significant value in letters like the one from Russell Broadbent, particularly when they raise serious public health concerns.
Firstly, whether or not this specific letter leads to immediate change, it’s critical that issues like vaccine safety and accountability are raised in formal, documented ways. These efforts contribute to public discourse and create a record that can be referred to later, even if action isn’t immediate. It may not seem like much now, but these formal notices hold power, especially when the stakes involve public health and government responsibility. History shows that systemic change often starts with incremental steps like these—persistent efforts that eventually gain momentum.
You’re absolutely right to point out the challenges we face, from ignored warnings to questionable human rights practices during the pandemic. But I’d argue that this is precisely why ongoing pressure and formal accountability are so important. Even if civil unrest doesn’t erupt, public engagement and awareness do make a difference over time. Silence only guarantees more inaction, while persistent advocacy at least keeps the conversation alive and may influence future decisions.
Regarding Albo’s past behavior and possible future inaction, I understand your skepticism, and it may indeed feel like a long shot. However, giving up entirely and resorting to extreme measures only weakens legitimate efforts for change. We need to encourage legal, transparent, and well-organized approaches to hold leadership accountable. While change may be slow, it is still achievable through continuous civic engagement, voting, and encouraging others to be informed.
Lastly, I’d argue that the strength of a democracy lies in its citizens’ ability to continuously push for better governance. As challenging as the current political situation is, it’s important that we don’t succumb to complete cynicism or lose faith in the power of our voices. Each step toward accountability, no matter how small, is still a step forward.
Thank you again for your perspective, and I hope we can continue to advocate for meaningful change.
There are always people out there like Russell Broadbent who are willing to do things the more 'proper' way, and pursue justice in above-board forms. I think that's a good thing - because as you've correctly written, it documents concerns and can thus allow for things to change slowly but surely over time.
Unfortunately, most of the political things I've seen changing 'slowly but surely over time' have been BAD with further bad changes cemented in on top of those, making them harder to roll back.
I appreciate that Russell Broadbent is taking up the fight. There are a number of politicians doing that now, and Albo is starting to look a bit uneasy. However, he has friends in high (low!) places and he won't be quitting any time soon.
I can see both sides of the story here, Gaz, and I agree that it usually helps to continually push for better governance. However, it also helps to be able to understand when that system is broken and when you might need to resort to other measures. So by all means, we should pursue justice in an above-board manner, but we should also be prepared for more underhanded tactics from these same bastards who will not let others in so the system can be democratically changed! It's not a fair fight if they're not playing by the rules. And sometimes you have to break a few rules, too, if you want to win. And that, my friend, is a very fine line to tread - because when does one become as bad as the other side through those measures...?
But one must know when enough is enough. I think there is always that line in the sand. And Labor & Co (ie the big parties + Greens) are getting really close to crossing that line again. They crossed it during covid. Therefore these same people cannot be trusted EVER AGAIN in my books. Some lines must never be crossed. And they are trying SO HARD to cross it again. So I personally am running out of patience, and if someone asked me the way to Parliament House so they could destroy it, I'd gladly show them the way. People make their beds and they lie in them, Gaz. The majority of politicians in this country have been making very bad beds indeed and I have no real urge to save them.
I'm all for meaningful change, but how can one have meaningful change when 95% of the system is corrupt, even the judges?!
I think you are foolishly hopeful. It will take more than a letter or three to make the positive sweeping changes this country so desperately needs. And yes, these changes have to come from its citizens. The same citizens who are just about exhausted from the merry-go-round of pain that the politicians keep subjecting us to.
I have written to SO MANY politicians in my time, including Russell Broadbent recently. I've gone to rallies, spoken at rallies, signed countless petitions, written lots of Submissions for Bills, am part of a think tank that sends out media releases etc. I want positive change, like many, and I've put a lot of effort into it in my time - because I think people need to exercise their civic duties!. But I also don't want us to have a revolution. And perhaps that's the problem. Maybe we DO need civil unrest, and even a revolution. We need to tell these pollies once and for all who's boss: certainly not them! THEY work for US. Theoretically, that's how it's meant to work, but I'm not sure it ever did. And unless we're willing to fight for it, then we will never own it.
Everyone needs to know when to salvage things and when to abandon ship. And if more disastrous bills get passed in this country, and other bad ones are not rolled back, then we have no country worth saving anymore. And that is mostly because not enough people have tried to save it. I know I've tried. If everyone took as active an interest as I have, then we'd be a great country. But people are inherently lazy and want everything on a platter. I can't make enough people care, Gaz, about anything, no matter how hard I try.
It's even quite possible that we NEED terrible times to make people give a shit again! If they ever did give a shit, that is, given we're a penal colony...
We are living in Complicated Times.
Thank you for your thoughtful observations, which I believe are very insightful. I truly appreciate the balanced perspective you’ve provided, especially on the need for continuous, above-board action. While you mention I might be “foolishly hopeful,” I take that as a compliment—it speaks to the belief that hope, however difficult, remains a powerful force for change. I completely agree that civil unrest is not the answer. Instead, we must continue to mobilize peaceful, determined pushback, just as you’ve been doing through your advocacy, petitions, and active civic engagement. It’s through these sustained, principled efforts that we can build momentum for positive change, even if it feels like an uphill battle.
Would Leslyn Lewis or any CPC do the same in Canada?
Will Albo accept that the Covaxx was dangerous and the relevant Australian authorities did not carry out due diligence??
One way or another, Albanese will be put in the position of fessing up!
It's pointless suggesting this PM should act for ethical reasons - ethics as normally understiood mean nothing to socialists. It's also pointless making dark sugestions of civil unrest to follow. The socialist elites who run Australia have contingency plans in place for civil unrest. They have a newly-militarised police force fully armed with advanced crowd control and surveillance technology at the ready. Civil unrest will be crushed ruthlessly should it become a credible threat.
I understand your frustration, and it's easy to feel disillusioned when the systems in place seem so deeply entrenched. If we agree that calling for ethical leadership might not resonate with certain ideologies, then perhaps the focus needs to shift towards more pragmatic approaches. One potential alternative is to work within the legal and democratic frameworks available, supporting reforms that decentralize power or push for greater accountability through checks and balances. Another option is to build strong, independent institutions and community-driven initiatives that can operate outside traditional political structures. Civic education and fostering local engagement could help empower individuals to take more control of their lives and communities, diminishing the influence of any one political elite. Although the obstacles are significant, sustained pressure through peaceful, organized advocacy often leads to lasting change. What are your thoughts on this approach?
Were copies sent to all MP’s, the TGA, etc. etc.?
As far as I know, yes. It was, we were told, distributed via internal Parliamentary means. The PM was noticed and therefore, the whole of government! No one should underestimate the relevance of this.
I doubt the corporation will care, time to install the actual commonwealth government.
Just my cynical take on things, but Albanese will not consciously choose to either protect or fail the public. Like most self-selecting 'leaders' beyond the scale of local communities, regardless of political ideology, he is a Cluster B sociopath ... high on a scale of narcissistic, opportunistic, and psychopathic behavior traits. A god-king, and in his own mind, the center of the universe. To the likes of him — people, their laws, and language itself are just exploitable resources. In a New World Order, I could imagine him and Kamala Harris as running mates in the kabuki show of democratic elections. Trump is no better. Or Kishida.
Steve, I believe you take on Albanese, seems reasonable. Most of his vote winning promise during the election have amounted to naught. Cost of living up, power prices through the roof, and nothing done about the debacle COVID response … in fact he’s overseen a continuation of the COVID absurdity!
Point me to where on the letter it says it is a NOTICE. It’s not a NOTICE.
There is no legal requirement for a document to explicitly include the word “notice” for it to function as one. The key factor is whether the document clearly conveys the important matters or issues, thereby fulfilling the purpose of providing notice.
The letter to Prime Minister Albanese sufficiently outlines the relevant concerns, such as vaccine contamination and related risks, and clearly informs him of the situation, therefore it can be considered that he has been “noticed.” The content and intent of the communication is what matters legally, not the specific terminology used.
This letter, for Australians, begs the question why other countries aren’t doing the same, (ie: Canada).
There is the case, as I’d described above, about the Quebec former lawyer bringing a class action lawsuit, but Health Canada needs to be held to account, and where’s all the research money to start doing genotoxicity, carcinotoxicity and long term studies from the pharmaceutical companies. I would not trust the Pharma companies to do the studies and testing it they should be coughing up all that profit they got from these gene therapy agents to have others, more trusted scientists do the studies
Are not the 'Liberals' [and their Corporate associates that unlawfully enforced actions] that purchased these products under 'secret' contract also fully liable?
Suing them in their private capacity, is without doubt, the way to go. As soon as they step out of their officer status and functions… into them. Easy said than done of course!
When it eventually hits the fan, it will be lawfare open season, I would think!
The only problem to the lawfare against the government, is the government has an endless supply of taxpayer dollars and the largest law office with thousands of lawyers at their disposal. What we have to do is sue them personally so it comes out of their pockets to defend themselves. Most politicians say, “bring it on” knowingly they will get the best of the best to defend them. See Gloriane Blais, former Quebec lawyer in class action lawsuit against a lot of politicians, but she’s suing them personally in their private capacity
Shared, so many won't read it of course, I'm surely blocked from news organisations by now, but I send these things anyway. I dare say the journalists choose to ignore these things, why I do not know... Something tells me they are either as brainwashed as the rest of the population via exposure to mainstream reporting overseas, in a groupthink scenario or are literally told they can not touch this subject.
If this was on the news, in the light it should be, the outrage would be huge, and in that sense maybe this is part of the reason. But people have a right to know before they next roll up their sleeve, so their silence on the matter is criminal.
Probably why the govt needs the new censorship bill rushed through, and why mainstream media have a deal that they are immune to this bill. Seriously it can't be a law, with fines, if some people are exempt, it must cover all... This is the dystopia we are in.
Hats off to Minister Broadbent for standing up, what a legend.
Small correction Steve. Russell Broadbent was ejected from Liberal Party after decades of service, like Gerard Rennick and is not a minister.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell_Broadbent
Not surprised that they did that to him, can't have party members going against the narrative... The two party system is so infiltrated by big business and other organisations ... Three if we count the "Greens".
I hope they ask Gigi ( a co signatory) some hard questions Geoff. I wouldn't have her in my camp.
Just One Focus website - Constitution, Treason and Treachery
https://www.justonefocus.org/category/constitution-treason-and-treachery/page/4/
It's great to be hopeful and positive. Truth and love prevails in spirit. But the last few years have demonstrated that the people with the guns win here. Politicians are clowns. The military (paramilitary ) have the guns , they enforce the decisions. The Australian military take orders from their masters . We could look towards those people . It used to be the queen, who are the unaccountable now?