Denis Rancourt argues that all-cause mortality, which tracks death rates regardless of cause, is the most unbiased metric for assessing public health impacts, including pandemics. His analysis concludes that there has been no detectable increase in all-cause mortality attributable to COVID-19, comparable to other viral respiratory diseases like those in 1957-58, 1968, and 2009, which also did not show increases in all-cause mortality.
Rancourt highlights that the significant mortality events during the COVID period often coincided with government actions rather than the virus itself. He points to the synchronicity of death surges with pandemic declarations and local responses, suggesting that these were not consistent with a naturally spreading virus. Instead, he attributes these mortality spikes to aggressive government measures and hospital protocols rather than the virus itself.
His further analysis notes that excess mortality often didn’t cross national or state borders, challenging the notion of a widespread viral threat. He argues that the real impacts on mortality were socio-economic changes, aggressive medical treatments, and the psychological effects of the pandemic response, including stress and isolation, which significantly impacted immune responses.
Rancourt also critically assesses the COVID-19 vaccine rollout, correlating it with peaks in all-cause mortality and suggesting that vaccine-related deaths were significant, particularly among the elderly and vulnerable. He estimates that the vaccines may have caused millions of deaths globally.
Ultimately, Rancourt concludes that there was no pandemic in the traditional sense, as defined by a significant increase in all-cause mortality caused by a virulent pathogen. Instead, he views the COVID-19 response as a form of social and economic assault on populations, exacerbated by public health measures and media-driven fear, which were far more detrimental than the virus itself. This perspective invites a reevaluation of pandemic responses, vaccine use, and public health strategies, particularly in their socio-political and economic contexts.
... hi Gaz, this looks interesting, and I will look later!... here's a comment I posted moments ago on Unbekoming, I hope u find an opportunity to take a look ... ...hi Unbekoming,, I'm posting a link here rather than in the comment section of ur recent swarm post...it's not a visual approach, except perhaps through the penetrating eye of intuition and associated imagination, however the approach herein adopted may serve to stimulate... https://gerryoc.substack.com/p/the-climate-shower-raining-down-their ... i'll also take the liberty of posting my exact comment on Gaz's stack!...looks like a great interview with Paul, which i'll read later! Thanks!...and I hope u soon get an opportunity to take a look!
Hey mate I saw this article and the small photo and it looked just like your Substack icon - I absolutely flipped! Guy is even called Gary (Gaz) in the US but doesn't look like you: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13411385/Australia-pilot-America-Gary-Clarke.html
Standing by.