Contamination Cover-Up—Millions Injected, Warnings Ignored, and the TGA Stayed Silent
“It wasn’t an accident. It was a betrayal. A betrayal by those who were meant to protect us.” – Geoff Pain, PhD
Who is Geoff Pain?
Dr. Geoff Pain is a passionate and relentless Australian scientist who has been ringing alarm bells since the beginning of the COVID-19 injection rollout. Unlike paid experts toeing the government line, Pain isn’t afraid to speak out. His investigations dig deep into the murky world of vaccine contaminants—elements that were never supposed to be injected into anyone’s body. He's been publishing his research and findings on Substack, and many of us who care about truth have stood beside him. I even made a video—Deadly Betrayal—to support his work.
Now, with new evidence in hand, the time has come to say the quiet part out loud.
The Dirty Secret Hidden in the Vials
Most Australians still don’t know this: the COVID-19 mRNA injections (Pfizer and Moderna) have been found to contain genetic contaminants that were never supposed to be there—contaminants that could trigger harmful, even deadly, immune reactions. These include:
Double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) – known to provoke severe inflammation and autoimmune diseases
Bacterial DNA – a foreign genetic pollutant from the manufacturing process using E. coli bacteria
These substances are not theoretical risks. They have been measured—even acknowledged—by the manufacturers and regulatory bodies. But the public was never told.
And the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA)?
They knew.
And they did next to nothing.
What Is dsRNA and Why Should You Care?
Double-stranded RNA is a molecular warning flag for the human immune system. It mimics viral invaders and sends the body into overdrive—triggering inflammation, fever, headaches, joint pain, and in some cases, more serious conditions like myocarditis and autoimmune disease.
Even picograms (trillionths of a gram) of dsRNA can set off these reactions. That’s how potent it is.
Pfizer and BioNTech knew that their fast-tracked production process would lead to increased dsRNA levels. They even told the European Medicines Agency (EMA) that they adjusted their formulas to try and control it—but contamination still got through.
The TGA tested a batch (Lot FL7649) and recorded “no more than 40 picograms of dsRNA per microgram of RNA.”
But here's the kicker: they may not have even broken open the lipid nanoparticles to see what was really inside. In other words, the worst of it could still be hidden.
Bacterial DNA: Another Silent Threat
Then there’s the bacterial DNA—residual genetic fragments from the E. coli bacteria used to produce the mRNA. Even the FDA admits this stuff is dangerous, limiting it to 100 picograms per dose. But according to expert scientists like the late Maurice Hilleman (Merck’s legendary vaccine pioneer), no foreign DNA should ever be present in a vaccine. None. Because even a single fragment could theoretically trigger cancer or become integrated into human DNA.
Yes, you read that correctly.
Integration Risk: Altering Your Genetic Code
Foreign DNA or RNA, especially when wrapped in lipid nanoparticles and injected into your bloodstream, has the potential to enter your cells and—through natural DNA repair mechanisms—become part of your genome. The TGA deliberately avoided using the word "integrase" (the enzyme that facilitates this process) in public statements. They downplayed integration risks entirely.
But internal emails from the TGA (obtained via Freedom of Information) show they were very aware of the possibility. One staff member acknowledged:
“…foreign DNA can integrate into chromosomal DNA in the absence of an integrase... through DNA damage/repair processes.”
They hid this from the public.
The Testing Scandal: Junk Methods, False Assurances
Instead of using the most accurate, sensitive tests available, the TGA used outdated, semi-quantitative methods like immunoblotting (dot blots)—a technique so imprecise that even Queensland-based vaccine developers have publicly stated it is inadequate for detecting dsRNA at dangerous levels.
For endotoxins (toxic bacterial fragments), the TGA relied on the LAL test, which was not even validated for use with lipid nanoparticles. Experts have warned that the TGA's dilution method leads to false negatives, allowing contaminated batches to slip through regulatory cracks.
In short: they cut corners, ignored better science, and assured us everything was safe.
Why Isn’t This on the News?
Because the media—corporate and government-funded alike—won’t bite the hand that feeds them. Billions of dollars have been pumped into advertising and promotion for these shots. Dissent is censored. Whistleblowers are smeared. Scientists who raise concerns are ignored—or worse, silenced.
What This Means for You
If you, or someone you love, took these injections—you may have been poisoned. Not in a dramatic, instant-fatal way. But slowly. Quietly. At the cellular level. With foreign genetic material your body was never meant to receive.
And the people tasked with protecting you—the TGA—sat on their hands and let it happen.
We Must Demand Accountability
Australia deserves a Royal Commission into this betrayal. We must name names. We zmust demand transparency. And we must never again allow regulators to act as the enablers of multinational profiteers.
It’s time to stop whispering and start shouting.
They knew the risks.
They ignored them.
And now, millions are paying the price.
Support Geoff Pain’s work:
Watch the video: “Deadly Betrayal: They Knew the Risks and Ignored Them”
Note: This article is for public awareness. If you are experiencing symptoms you suspect are related to vaccination, please consult a healthcare professional and seek legal advice where appropriate.
Further Reading and Technical References
For those who want to explore the technical evidence behind this article, the following sources offer deep insights into the contamination concerns, biological mechanisms, and regulatory failures:
“Picograms of Double Stranded RNA a Headache for Jab Profiteers” – Geoff Pain, PhD
“Bacterial DNA a Major Worry in Jabs” – Geoff Pain, PhD
“TGA posts Misinformation on its DNA and Endotoxin Testing of Covid19 Jabs” – Geoff Pain, PhD
“Integration of Synthetic DNA into Human Genomes – The Word ‘Integrase’ the TGA Won’t Say” – Geoff Pain, PhD
Freedom of Information Request Data on Vaccine Contaminants (Hosted on Substack and referenced in scientific discussions)
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/foi-documents-contamination-covid-vaccines
These references include FOI documents, scientific citations, expert commentary, and visual data analyses. They are ideal for researchers, legal professionals, medical practitioners, and citizens who want to hold regulators and pharmaceutical companies accountable with the weight of documented evidence.
Nice work Gary.
Wait until they find out that all that scrambled DNA produces enormous quantities of endotoxin and to hide this figure they labelled it adjuvant so it would be protected by the label "trade secret".
They also admitted they had no way of ensuring a standardised amount or a method to remove it yet they classified this as adjuvant (with no possible way to cater for weight, sex, age, individual tolerance).
What also concerning is that the endotoxin issue also appears to encompass ALL biologicals and supplements. Coincidently numerous names of both sides of the freedom movement seem to have serious conflicts of interest...... Another climate change coincidence obviously.
I'm just the horses arse in relation to the above and hopefully Geoff chimes in but if I can work this out anyone can. Just the complete impossibility to ensure any semblance of safety makes the illogical labelling of adjuvant a farce and why isn't this addressed in our various lawsuits. From my limited knowledge NO ONE can argue that endotoxin could be safe when the variables above aren't rigorously controlled (tbh if at all).
Treason is the term we all must come to terms with- billions potentially intergenerationally/permanently genetically edited by GMO shit bacteria, endotoxin m(odified)RNA (and that's if they've been honest)
What else makes sense and explains the entire picture?
Great work Gaz... The whole thing now seems beyond an "oops" moment. It seems deliberate from day one, and the whole mechanism of making your own cells produce a foreign protein seems a crazy proposal let alone to actually go through with it, let alone pretty much force most people to take it (yes many DID have a choice, take it or be homeless and jobless, but to me that counts as being forced). Playing cover up, and still promoting these shots speaks volumes.
Glad I took the job loss option, who wants to work for such mentally deranged simpletons anyway? Part of the cover up by the government is to protect the dummy bosses who might actually start to grow a conscience if they knew they'd forced a workmate to take a potential suicide shot. The rest of the cover up is to protect themselves from those who would suddenly find out they were poisoned and lied to.
A bunch of workmates didn't want the shot where I worked due to injured loved ones (Gee how rare can side effects be if five people in the workplace have suspicious deaths and heart injuries linked to a "vaccine"?) ... These people unfortunately had more to lose than me, and hung out for Novavax... Yet again I had my doubts about that vac as it still was full of nanoparticles, spike protein and a new adjuvant (Matrix M) whose properties seemed mysterious.
I read a Jikkileaks post a while ago on X, plus Geoff Pain's last Substack reminded me how little has been researched on this dark horse... There was a high myocarditis side effect, due perhaps to cytotoxic nature of spike protein, but at this point curiosity about Matrix M's properties comes into play.
Damaging of cell membrane via saponin element, and membrane fuse capacity of phospholipid and cholesterol? Was this something that could carry spike protein straight into the cell? Even worse there seems to have been DNA plasmids used in Novavax manufacture, SV40 containing plasmids that is... Could they also be carried in?
I took what info I had, and asked AI Grok to process via an innocent question without laying it all on the line, here's the main points in the response... My question basically being could Matrix M be used as a transfection agent for mRNA in the future (as of course Novavax is not an mRNA vaccine):
"While its nanoparticles might interact with cell membranes due to their lipid components and saponin’s membrane-disrupting properties, this interaction is more likely to cause immune activation (e.g., via inflammation or antigen uptake) than transfection.
Saponins are known to form pores in membranes, but this is distinct from the controlled mRNA delivery seen with LNPs.
Could Matrix-M theoretically transfect cells if combined with mRNA?
Possibly, if reformulated with a nucleic acid payload and optimized for delivery—but that’s not its current design or function."
The next question would be, what if there IS a potential payload in Novavax spike, or DNA plasmid, or other contaminant??
Just while we're all distracted on Pfizer, Moderna and AZ, I wondered if Novavax may actually have had a similar effect on cellular health?!
Geoff's article:
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/sv40-promoter-in-novavax-who-is-measuring?publication_id=1264116&post_id=160692769&isFreemail=true&r=tymb5&triedRedirect=true
Jikkileaks original post:
https://x.com/Jikkyleaks/status/1713310053368049742