Article Review: Addressing Allegations of DNA Contamination in mRNA Vaccines
Original Source: Dystopian Down Under
This article, published by Dystopian Down Under, is a highly recommended examination of the Therapeutic Goods Administration's (TGA) recent claims regarding alleged misinformation about synthetic DNA contamination in modified RNA (mod-RNA) Covid vaccines. The article meticulously addresses each of the TGA’s assertions, contending that they lack substantiated evidence and fail to counter independent scientific findings about possible DNA contamination risks.
Key Points from the Review:
Rigorous Analysis of TGA Statements: The article challenges the TGA’s claims that contamination reports are scientifically unsound, arguing that these statements are presented without direct refutation or robust counter-evidence.
Testing Methodologies Questioned: Dystopian Down Under critiques the TGA's reliance on quantitative PCR (qPCR) for DNA testing, highlighting that independent studies have employed fluorometry and other methods, which may provide a more accurate reading of residual DNA levels.
Sample and Methodology Validity: The review addresses TGA's dismissal of independent testing as using “expired” or “unsuitable” samples, arguing that synthetic DNA remains stable under various conditions, thus preserving the validity of the results.
LNP-Encapsulated DNA Risks: By exploring the potential for DNA within lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) to integrate into human cells, the article raises concerns about the novel technology used in mod-RNA vaccines, pointing out that current regulatory guidelines do not adequately cover this innovative method.
Transparency and Accountability: The article critiques the TGA’s lack of transparency and unresponsiveness to independent scientists’ findings, alongside a failure to make batch-testing data publicly accessible.
Potential Genomic Risks: A specific focus is given to the SV40 enhancer/promoter found in the Pfizer vaccine, which may carry risks of genomic integration, as indicated by scientific studies cited within the article.
Implications for Public Discourse: The article concludes with a cautionary note on the potential impacts of the TGA’s stance on “misinformation,” especially in light of pending legislation that could restrict scientific debate in Australia.
Recommendation
This article from Dystopian Down Under is a thorough and compelling review of independent scientific evidence and regulatory standards surrounding mod-RNA vaccine safety. It is essential reading for those interested in the intersection of public health, regulatory transparency, and scientific integrity. For more detailed information, I highly recommend visiting Dystopian Down Under via Rebekah Barnett’s Substack.
We may never know all the constituents in the vials. For me, this is another reason not to take. Something made the vaccinated immediately present with a respiratory illness that transmitted to those around. I have met a handful (less than 5) who have been diagnosed with a strange and mysterious illness (previous healthy) without taking the jab(s). Avoid the recently mRNA jabbed. Shedding is real.